Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: atinout
Version : 0.9.1+git20150607.4976a6c
Upstream Contact: Håkon Løvdal
* URL : https://atinout.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming
TL;DR can we please fix salsa-ci, gbp and dgit?
Good morning,
This is certainly not the most pleasant subject, but as several critical
tools and services are currently taking a direction that is, in my
opinion, misguided, a discussion here may help to steer that ship in a
way that will prev
Dear Julien,
You already started a discussion about this salsa some time ago.[1]
You have now come to debian-devel and posted a highly inflammatory
message accusing all sorts of things of being broken, while actually
arguing in fairly vague terms.
I don't think any productive discussion can be h
The Debian Technical Committee was asked to rule about a dispute between
the avahi and systemd maintainers in #1091864.
The following resolution was passed. The decision was reached
unanimously meeting the required 3:1 majority requirement for overruling
a maintainer.
=== Resolution ===
The CTTE
On 26/02/2025 00:10, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 08:14:52 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>> $ check_for_missing_breaks_replaces.py -o
>> ${WORKING_DIR}/missing_breaks.xml --changes-file
>> ${WORKING_DIR}/*.changes
>> [ERROR] Missing Breaks/Replaces found
>> [ERROR] foo conflicts wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ocaml-mirage-ptime
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Contact: Hannes Mehnert
* URL : https://github.com/mirage/mirage-ptime
*
Hi all,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:26:12PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Michel,
> >
> > On Thursday, February 13, 2025 2:36:26 PM MST Michel Lind wrote:
> > > Ah, OK, so these uploads all require FTP master review right?
> > >
>
Hi,
can this be fixed to suggest Conflicts instead of Breaks/Replaces if the file
in the other package is still shipped in the current version?
Breaks/Replaces implies that ownership should be transferred from the other
package to this one. This is most often correct, but care needs to be taken
Hi!
On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 08:14:52 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
> complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
> don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
> distribution without having proper B
Hi Sean,
Le 2025-02-25 11:27, Sean Whitton a écrit :
You have now come to debian-devel and posted a highly inflammatory
message accusing all sorts of things of being broken, while actually
arguing in fairly vague terms.
On the discussion in question there are several references of actual
cas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: passage
Version : 1.7.4a2
Upstream Contact: h...@filippo.io
* URL : https://github.com/FiloSottile/passage
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Shell
Description : fork of password-store using age as encr
Hi all package maintainers who use Salsa CI,
Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that
complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce
don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the
distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the
`debia
12 matches
Mail list logo
