Hi All,
According
to https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=lazarus&version=3.8%2Bdfsg1-4 my
package have a patch with invalid metadata. There seem to be that the tool
considers the following as an error:
Forwarded: Yes
Bug-Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
Hi Abou,
Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 13:13:32)
> According
> to https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=lazarus&version=3.8%2Bdfsg1-4 my
> package have a patch with invalid metadata. There seem to be that the tool
> considers the following as an error:
> Forwarded: Yes
> Bug-Upstream: http
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 15:57, M. Zhou wrote:
> (1) do you know any important but missing reference materials?
Is it worth explicitly mentioning weights are also released under very
restrictive non-free licenses? The list of Apache/MIT licenses might
mislead a reader into believing all weights are
Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Bug-Upstream:
> > https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
>
> I believe the intended DEP-3 syntax for this is:
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/laz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Peugnet
* Package name: golang-github-package-url-packageurl-go
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : package-url authors
* URL : https://github.com/package-url/packageurl-go
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Peugnet
* Package name: golang-github-tonistiigi-vt100
Version : 0.0~git20240514.90bafcd-1
Upstream Author : Tõnis Tiigi
* URL : https://github.com/tonistiigi/vt100
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Peugnet
* Package name: golang-github-moby-buildkit
Version : 0.14.1-1
Upstream Author : Moby
* URL : https://github.com/moby/buildkit
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : concurrent,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Peugnet
* Package name: golang-github-tonistiigi-go-archvariant
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Tõnis Tiigi
* URL : https://github.com/tonistiigi/go-archvariant
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Descr
Hi!
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 22:33:16 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:35 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > But also, in this particular case, it's not the issue of the spec but of a
> > particular tool trying to enforce the rule.
> >
> > I'll file a bug to fix it.
> I fin
Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 16:13:44)
>
> >
> On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > > Bug-
> > > > Upstream:
> > > > https://gitlab.com/freepa
On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Bug-Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
I believe the intended DEP-3 syntax for this is:
Bug: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
so using that instead of Bug-Upst
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 10:14 AM Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> With regards to other possible values (No, NotNeeded), I find it a bit hacky
> to use this field to provide an upstream bug URL.
> I would completely remove this practice and keep this field human readable
> and understandable to be a sim
>
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > Bug-
> > > Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
> >
> > I believe the intende
Hi,
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:35 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> But also, in this particular case, it's not the issue of the spec but of a
> particular tool trying to enforce the rule.
>
> I'll file a bug to fix it.
I finally found many reports already dealing with this issue in the bug tracker.
hi,
I'd like to extend adequate(1) to allow maintainers to suppress the reporting of
Debian policy violations, much like lintian has overrides. if you care about
binary package qa testing, please review:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adequate/-/wikis/proposals/overrides
if you don't li
Hi Jonas,
On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 17:05 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Abou Al Montacir (2025-02-01 16:13:44)
> >
> > >
> > On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 14:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Quoting Simon McVittie (2025-02-01 14:21:38)
> > > > On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 at 13:13:32 +0100, Abou Al
Hi all,
I heard that people were looking for me during FOSDEM.
I spent a couple of hours and finally get something draft-ish
for the previously mentioned general resolution on the software
freedom interpolation with respect to AI software.
https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg
(I turned the
17 matches
Mail list logo
