Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aloïs Micard
* Package name: golang-github-go-logr-zapr
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/go-logr/zapr
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A logr implementation
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: reform-handbook
Version : 2024-08-19
Upstream Contact: Lukas F. Hartmann
* URL : https://source.mnt.re/reform/reform-handbook/
* Licens
Il 18/08/2024 15:51, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Il 17/08/2024 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
Quoting Fabio Fantoni (2024-08-17 11:20:01)
Il 17/08/2024 10:47, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
Hi Chris,
Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2024-08-17 10:17:19)
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 23:36:31 +0200, gregor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yogeswaran Umasankar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, y...@debian.org
* Package name: sphinx-thebe
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Contact: Executable Books Team
* URL : https://github.com/executablebooks/sphinx-thebe
* Lic
Sounds weird, doesn't it?
I would like to know what is the general feeling about this idea, with
a use case.
Let me start with a practical use case: Qt. As you might or not know,
Qt is build by using "submodules" that create the whole SDK:
https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/images/qt6_build_de
Hello,
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, le lun. 19 août 2024 20:17:08 -0300, a
ecrit:
> But users would love to have something like 'qt6-full-dev'. And the
> reason we never provided them with this meta-package is that package
> maintainers would use it almost everywhere, dragging the whole Q
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> So, what about if we could have [meta] packages that can be installed by
> the user but not used as Build-Depends entries? Please note that for the
> moment I'm targeting more at the idea itself rather than at the
> implementation (but I'll certainly
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-httpx-sse
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Contact: Florimond Manca
* URL : https://github.com/florimondmanca/httpx-sse
* License : Expat
Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-shibuya
Version : 2024.7.13
Upstream Contact: Hsiaoming Yang
* URL : https://github.com/lepture/shibuya
* License : BSD-3-clause
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-sse-starlette
Version : 2.1.3
Upstream Contact: sysid
* URL : https://github.com/sysid/sse-starlette
* License : BSD-3-clause
Program
Dear Sirs,
Hello, I am Tammy from HK China.
We mainly Cosmetics, Skin Care Products, etc hope to have the opportunity to
cooperation.
Best regards,
Tammy
Hi fellow developers,
(modified resend, as first attempt didn't arrive)
please allow me to open a can of worms. Package removal from unstable.
Deciding when it is time to remove a package from unstable is difficult.
There may be users still and it is unclear whether keeping the package
imposes a
Hi!
## How many source packages are in Debian unstable as of today?
± zgrep "^Package: " Sources.gz | wc -l
38199
## How many source packages have a gbp.conf?
± ls -1 *_gbp.conf | wc -l
13570
(24629 do not have it)
## What is the most popular 'debian-branch'?
Note! The Sources.gz used to anal
Hi,
On 8/20/24 14:28, Helmut Grohne wrote:
enigmail
Thunderbird has native GPG support now, including (well-hidden) support
for calling into the installed gpg binary to use a smartcard.
mutextrace
Oof, I should fix that finally, because in principle a debugging layer
to find lock hiera
Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2024-08-20 07:28:52)
> What do you think about the proposed criteria and suggested set of source
> packages? Is it reasonable to remove these packages from unstable? In a
> sense, it is extending the idea of the testing auto remover to unstable.
> Similarly, a package ca
Hi,
On 20/08/2024 07:28, Helmut Grohne wrote:
[…]
What does a package cost?
[ a lot ]
What does package removal cost?
[…] Sometimes, packages are reintroduced. Doing so incurs a pass
through NEW (and review by the ftp team). […]
That’s the main reason why I usually keep packages around
16 matches
Mail list logo
