On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 00:24 +, Wookey wrote:
> People keep telling us (@ARM) how marvellous Rust is, and we keep
> telling them that it's useless in the real world until it sorts out
> the stable ABI/dynamic linking problem.
IIRC that has been worked on for some years now, and IIRC
the static
On Jan 25, Wookey wrote:
> Luca is quite right here. Ultimately this can only be fixed by these
> ecosystems understanding that software in these languages cannot be
> sensibly used in distributions until they support modularity and
> stability. The rust people make the excuse that they are 'too
Hello.
Paul Wise writes:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 00:24 +, Wookey wrote:
>
>> People keep telling us (@ARM) how marvellous Rust is, and we keep
>> telling them that it's useless in the real world until it sorts out
>> the stable ABI/dynamic linking problem.
>
> IIRC that has been worked on fo
Simon Josefsson writes:
> I want to explore if there is a possibility to change status quo, and
> what would be required to do so.
> Given how often gnulib is vendored for C code in Debian, and other
> similar examples, I don't think of this problem as purely a Go/Rust
> problem. The parallel a
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:11, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Simon Josefsson writes:
>
> > I want to explore if there is a possibility to change status quo, and
> > what would be required to do so.
>
> > Given how often gnulib is vendored for C code in Debian, and other
> > similar examples, I don't thi
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 18:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Paul Wise writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 00:24 +, Wookey wrote:
> >
> >> People keep telling us (@ARM) how marvellous Rust is, and we keep
> >> telling them that it's useless in the real world until it sorts out
> >> the
Package: general
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: h...@test.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: werdah...@riseup.net, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: xwayland-run
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Contact: Oliver Fourdan
* URL : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/ofour
Package: general
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@a.com, h...@test.com
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1061518
Bug #1061518 [general] (no subject)
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1061512
Bug #1061512 [general] 4
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061512: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061512
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
I always wondered if there was a reason to allow unverified BTS access ?
Le jeu. 25 janv. 2024 à 21:27, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> a écrit :
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > close 1061512
> Bug #1061512 [general] 4
> Marked Bug as done
> > thanks
>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:03:05PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 18:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Paul Wise writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 00:24 +, Wookey wrote:
> > >
> > >> People keep telling us (@ARM) how marvellous Rust is, and we keep
>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 09:37:27AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Simon Josefsson writes:
>
> >> > My naive approach on how to fix a security problem in package X
> >> > which is
> >> > statically embedded into other packages A, B, C, ... would be to
> >> > rebuild
> >> > the transitive closure
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:48 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> For the record I have not heard from ftpmasters on this issues, and I
> know only what is in this public mailinglist thread.
>
> Obviously I would be happy to be able to maintain the package that I am
> listed as maintainer of. And if that
On 2024-01-25 17:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
Rebuilding a bunch of software after a security fix is not a completely
intractable problem that we have no idea how to even approach. It's
just
CPU cycles and good metadata plus ensuring that our software can be
rebuilt, something that we already promi
Quoting Jeremy Bícha (2024-01-25 22:05:27)
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:48 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > For the record I have not heard from ftpmasters on this issues, and I
> > know only what is in this public mailinglist thread.
> >
> > Obviously I would be happy to be able to maintain the pack
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1061518
Bug #1061518 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [general] (no
subject)
Bug 1061518 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061518: https://bugs.deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vivek K J
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-redis-client
Version : 0.19.1
Upstream Contact: jean.bouss...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/redis-rb/redis-client
* License : Expat
Progr
Hi!
> Thats beginning to look like the history of check-all-the-things.
Yeah, I remember looking into cats some years back as a place to learn
what commands exist. Similarly I also occasionally browse
https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html.
The challenge with having all possible checkers is that they
20 matches
Mail list logo
