Bug#1061074: ITP: golang-github-hugelgupf-p9 -- p9 implementation written in golang

Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler Severity: wishlist * Package name: golang-github-hugelgupf-p9 Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : gvisor authors * URL or Web page : https://github.com/hugelgupf/p9 * License : Apache 2.0 Description : p9 implementation written in

Bug#1061078: ITP: oaknut -- Aarch64 (arm64) code emitter

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David James X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, davidjamescastor...@proton.me * Package name: oaknut Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Contact: MerryHime * URL : https://github.com/merryhime/oaknut * License

build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

Last year, Helmut Grohne proposed a nogir build profile to help with cross-compiling the GLib ecosystem: . After some discussion on #1030223, I have a revised proposal, with the same name but slightly different rules: profile name:

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

Am 17.01.24 um 23:00 schrieb Simon McVittie: Last year, Helmut Grohne proposed a nogir build profile to help with cross-compiling the GLib ecosystem: . After some discussion on #1030223, I have a revised proposal, with the same name but

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 23:15:03 +0100, Matthias Geiger wrote: > Am 17.01.24 um 23:00 schrieb Simon McVittie: > > Public GIR XML (Foo-1.gir) is normally in the -dev package alongside the > > C headers, but recent versions of gobject-introspection define a canonical > > virtual package name gir1.2-fo

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi Colin, On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > Also a problem is that experimental al