Hi Steve
On 2024-01-05 20:26:56 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:32:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-01-05 11:06:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > Hi Steve
>
> > > > > - perl
Am Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 01:06:25PM +0100 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:33:06AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > On 2024-01-03 11:12, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:58:33AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > > > To me the most time consuming tas
On Mon, 08 Jan 2024 at 15:01:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If a maintainer ignores the NMU and drops the rename, they'll be introducing
> a new library transition again on 32-bit archs. Won't they also be caught
> again in binary NEW, for those packages that don't have the same runtime
> libra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robinson Uchechukwu
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-yarn-plugin-apt
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Debian JavaScript Team
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/yarn-plugin-apt
* License
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally
> > > unrelated updates like new upstream versio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon McVittie
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org, pkg-sdl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: sdl2-compat
Version : currently 2.28.50~git20240108
Upstream Contact: https://githu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Bauch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kvazaar
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Ari Lemmetti, Marko Viitanen, Alexandre Mercat,
Jarno Vanne
* URL : https://github.com/ultr
Hi!
I've noticed that the most recent LLMs are actually very good at
finding information, summarizing and giving code examples about Debian
already without extra training. One just needs to double check that
the answer was correct to not fall for when they are simply making up
plausible sounding s
Hi!
Is anybody aware if there is some kind of static analyzer for the
`debian/rules` file?
I can do very basic syntax checking with `make --dry-run
--makefile=debian/rules` which will error on serious syntax errors
(which I already implemented in my CI workflow[1]).
However, that or a general Ma
9 matches
Mail list logo
