Hello,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about
> changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A
> quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian and U
Hi,
On 11/14/23 18:42, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Instead I think pidof can just be part of procps package. The
sysvinit-utils package will then pull in procps via a dependency (once
sysvinit-utils stops being Essential), which would smooth the transition
for all sysvinit users until LSB pidofpr
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about
> changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A
> quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian an
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 10:13, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> So in essence, you asked for changing the pidof implementation and
> Andreas and me try to turn this into a much bigger quest of making it
> non-essential. While these matters are related, they can be done
> independently in principle and if you
On 14/11/23 11:11, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I welcome the effort in general. Like Andreas, I question whether having
pidof remain essential is useful. A quick codesearch
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%5Cbpidof%5Cb&literal=0 suggests
that we have less than 500 source packages that even mentio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ananthu C V
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: yte
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Johannes K��ster
* URL : https://github.com/yte-template-engine/yte
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Heider
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: asahi-audio
Version : 0.5
Upstream Authors: The Asahi Linux Contributors
URL : https://github.com/AsahiLinux/asahi-audio
* License : MIT
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: controku
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Contact: Ben Westover
* URL : https://github.com/benthetechguy/controku
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Geiger
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org,
werdah...@riseup.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: kooha
Version : 2.2.4
Upstream Contact: Dave Patrick Caber
Hello,
Please retain me in CC for all replies.
Everyone reading this most likely believes that PGP/GPG is a good thing;
Many will advocate for its use-by-default for even unimportant
correspondences, because privacy is a right. Meanwhile, everyday usage
of encryption normalises it, which is impo
Hi,
On 11/15/23 08:40, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
1. I've received a report that this provider is not appropriate for DM
and DD use, because the key pair is stored on their servers. Ie: The
applicant doesn't control the means to validating identity and
authorship.
Correct. I'd even go as far
On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 18:40 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> I see three outcomes:
>
> A) Continue to explain this to new contributors on a one-by-one
> basis.
> B) Advise against using Proton Mail for Debian work (where? our
> wiki?)
> C) Proton Mail begins to do something differently on th
On 15 November 2023 5:10:50 am IST, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>On the surface, this means Proton Mail (free account) is great! And for
>general use, I feel like we should be supportive of them; however, I'm
>starting to wonder if we need to recommend against the use of Proton
>mail for Debian
13 matches
Mail list logo
