Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-ntc-templates
Version : 3.5.0
Upstream Contact: Network to Code
* URL : https://github.com/networktocode/ntc-templates/
* License : Apache
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-scrapli-replay
Version : 2023.7.30
Upstream Contact: Carl Montanari
* URL : https://github.com/scrapli/scrapli_replay
* License : Expat
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 20:35 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Licenses will be included in common-licenses if they meet all of the
> following criteria:
>
> * The license is DFSG-free.
> * Exactly the same license wording is used by all works covered by it.
> * The license applies t
On 2023-09-12 03:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Gioele Barabucci (2023-09-12 09:19:26)
On 12/09/23 08:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Instead, even
the fonts-noto-core package installs a full pack of 268 (!) font files.
This is discussed in detail in #983291 [1].
The issues is not that there
On 2023-09-12 05:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
You don't need to physically merge font files, fontconfig is fine with many
fonts sharing the same name. You can't then request a specific font, but
taking missing glyphs from others still works.
(Haven't looked at this in a while, would need to test.)
Quoting Bobby de Vos (2023-09-13 18:47:22)
> On 2023-09-12 03:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Gioele Barabucci (2023-09-12 09:19:26)
> >> On 12/09/23 08:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >>> Instead, even
> >>> the fonts-noto-core package installs a full pack of 268 (!) font files.
> >>> This i
On 2023-09-09 23:08, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
My personal view is that it is a change in the right direction,
It struck me that I stated a position in my initial post without really
arguing for it. Silly me.
So with this message I try to repair that, and also highlight the
questions I thin
Hi Fabian,
On 2023-09-12 08:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
as has already been stated elsewhere, fontconfig upstream's move to
Noto as the default font has most probably not been done for
aesthetical reasons. That is, it is not the "most beautiful font"
that people "like better" then DejaVu, but th
Quoting Gunnar Hjalmarsson (2023-09-13 21:09:00)
> Should fonts-noto-core be installed by default?
> ---
> Personally I think it should. The primary reason is that fonts-noto-core
> offers a broad coverage of Unicode characters, and the quality is in
>
Quoting Gunnar Hjalmarsson (2023-09-13 21:28:00)
> Hi Fabian,
>
> On 2023-09-12 08:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > as has already been stated elsewhere, fontconfig upstream's move to
> > Noto as the default font has most probably not been done for
> > aesthetical reasons. That is, it is not the "m
10 matches
Mail list logo
