On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:17:18PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 22:52 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>...
> > 1) The library has a "main" header file that must be included before
> >any of the others, and it does not come first in lexicographical
> >order. It may defin
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations
> > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev
> > packages was missing one or more dependencies o
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:43:36PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>...
> I propose to add an autodep8 test for C/C++ header files that tries to
> compile the header file. This will catch issues like missing
> dependencies and other issues.
>...
An additional check with some overlap would be whether
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:35:01AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations
> > > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sudip Mukherjee
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com
* Package name: qad
Version : 0.0~git20230710.75f9d50
Upstream Contact: James Thomas
Scott Clarke
* URL : https://gitla
Hi there,
I recently visited "Energy Maintenance: Ensuring Efficiency and Sustainability"
(https://www.playdeb.net/energy-maintenance/) and thought the way you covered
the role of governments in promoting energy conservation through policies and
regulations was really interesting. It's not ofte
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:19:16AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:35:01AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ h
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> snapshot.debian.org is getting worse again. There is not a single snapshot for
> August yet and the last days of July are spotty:
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/?year=2023&month=7
>
> None
Hi,
DB Change Request is blocked like this:
> Command is not understood. Halted - no changes committed
As v=DMARC1 entry is not recognized, you can set DMARC for
external record (_dmarc.foobar.xx.) and set IN CNAME as a workaround
for debian.net.
(I've found this way via ldapsearch via ldap
Hi Sune,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I don't think this is a important problem that some headers might have
> special conditions for use. I'd rather have our developers spend time
> fixing other issues than satisfying this script.
A while ago, I've performed a
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 05:29:34PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think it's somewhat inevitable that code paths that aren't frequently
> exercised don't work. If a majority of maintainers are doing all of
> their builds with git-buildpackage, or dgit --clean=git, or something
> basically equival
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 18:32 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Manual opt-in for our > 11k -dev packages is a significant cost
> that would have to be justified by the people who oppose opt-out.
You could use the Janitor to do automatic opt-in where it works,
IIRC the Janitor runs autopkgtests before f
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 11:42 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> An additional check with some overlap would be whether
> pkgconf --cflags .pc
> returns 0 for every pkgconfig file in a package.
piuparts runs adequate, which runs something similar:
pkg-config --exists --print-errors .pc
It emits mi
On Sat, 2023-08-05 at 17:06 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I wonder what we should do, because 5000+ failing packages is a lot...
Add a message about this on tracker.debian.org for affected packages?
> Should we give up on requiring a 'clean' target that works? After all,
> when 17% of packages
Hi Ted,
* Theodore Ts'o [2023-08-08 20:28]:
I was curious about this, since I rely on snapshots.debian.org in
^ snapshot ;)
order to create repeatable builds for a file system test appliance, so
I started digging a bit. Looking at the debi
On Sat, 2023-08-05 at 17:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Devref §6.8.8.2 also says that "it is common for Debian users who
> need to build software for non-Debian platforms to fetch the source
> from a Debian mirror rather than trying to locate a canonical upstream
> distribution point", but I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo