Bug#1036924: ITP: obfuscate -- Censor private information from images

2023-05-29 Thread Matthias Geiger
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthias Geiger X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, matthias.geiger1...@tutanota.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: obfuscate Version : 0.0.9 Upstream

Bug#1036925: ITP: python3-pylxd -- Python module for LXD

2023-05-29 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathias Gibbens X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org * Package name: python3-pylxd Version : 2.3.1 Upstream Author : Canonical * URL : https://github.com/lxc/pylxd * License : Apache

Bug#1036926: ITP: lxd-ui -- A browser interface for LXD

2023-05-29 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathias Gibbens X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: lxd-ui Version : 0.0~git20230526.416dc86 Upstream Author : Canonical * URL : https://github.com/canonical/lxd-ui * License : GPL-3 Programming

Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

2023-05-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters, Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future. Here are some statistics that support this observation: - The last b

Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

2023-05-29 Thread Jessica Clarke
On 29 May 2023, at 17:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters, > > Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant > development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it > seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future. > Here

Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

2023-05-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:11:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant > development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it > seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future. > Here are some statistics

Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

2023-05-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
If and when GNU/kFreeBSD is dropped from debian-ports, is it ok to drop packaging overrides for the architecture from packages in Unstable? Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive

2023-05-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 18:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I would like to emphasize that packages will still be available on > snapshot.d.o for anyone interested in reviving the port. And the new port docs mention the potential procedures involved: https://wiki.debian.org/PortsDocs/New -- bye