Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-j...@lists.debian.org,
debian-secur...@lists.debian.org, j...@nahmias.net
Control: block 1031807 by -1
* Package name: ldaptive
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Authors: Daniel Fish
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ironic-python-agent
Version : 9.1.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Discuss
* URL : https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic-python-agent
* License : Apa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-hardware
Version : 0.30.0
Upstream Author : Red Hat
* URL : https://github.com/redhat-cip/hardware
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Faidon Liambotis
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pkcs11
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Danielle Madeley
* URL : https://github.com/danni/python-pkcs11/
* License : Expat
Programming
Am 2023-02-28 01:39, schrieb Steve Langasek:
[some precursor
I can see that for bootstrapping a new architecture, it will sometimes
be
useful to use a toolchain newer than the one that is currently default
in
Debian, and as a result it is useful to also be able to bypass new
stricter
-Werror
Should there be a standard email address for "I'm reporting this because
I noticed it, but I'm not interested in it"-bug reports?
Orphaned packages get their maintainer address set to
. Shouldn't something similar be available for bugs?
For example I have opened bugs years ago against package
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 06:05:13PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> > It isn't clear to me from the discussion history that this is the actual
> > use case at issue. But supposing it is, that's one use case; and it's a
> > use case that can be addressed without having to make any per-package
> > chan
On 28.02.23 20:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is conceptually interesting to me. In practice, I don't see us using
this in Ubuntu. We have per-architecture differences from Debian (ppc64el
building with -O3 by default; riscv64 being a release architecture where it
isn't in Debian) that make it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:10:24PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 28.02.23 20:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But it's not practical to do CI -Werror builds; when we do
> > out-of-archive rebuilds for all architectures, it's a significant
> > committment of resources and each rebuild takes about a m
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 18:36 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Should there be a standard email address for "I'm reporting this because
> I noticed it, but I'm not interested in it"-bug reports?
Similar to the BTS noowner command, perhaps add a nosubmitter command?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.deb
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 7:46 PM wrote:
>
> My friend has a spare Talos II motherboard that is currently sitting in his
> house
> in Indiana USA collecting dust.
>
> https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/
>
> I have convinced him to donate/sell it to an open source project or developer.
>
> I reached o
On Tuesday, February 28, 2023, wrote:
> Hello you fabulous developers!
>
> My friend has a spare Talos II motherboard that is currently sitting in
his house
> in Indiana USA collecting dust.
>
> https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/
>
> I have convinced him to donate/sell it to an open source project
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Blair Noctis
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, n...@sail.ng
* Package name: ouch
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Contact: Vinícius R. Miguel
* URL : https://crates.io/crates/ouch
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: R
13 matches
Mail list logo
