Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Osamu Aoki
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dual-function-keys
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Alexander Courtis
* URL :
https://gitlab.com/interception/linux/plugins/dual-function-keys.git
* Licens
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #837336
Owner: Raul Vidal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, raulvior@gmail.com
I'm packaging this software (first time I try to package and upload a
piece of software). I already packaged the base library (libgawkextlib). Then I
was going to file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dh-puredata
Version : 1
Upstream Author : IOhannes m zmölnig
* URL : * https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/dh-puredata
* License
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:58:37AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote:
> All of these timestamps (for sid) are close to each other, but not
> identical. I would guess that the earliest timestamp is the 'real'
> timestamp, but it is accessible (on snapshot.d.o) only with a later
> timestamp.
Consider that
Hi,
Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream version
with uscan. How do you deal with it?
$ cat debian/watch
version=4
https://github.com/KittyKatt/screenFetch/releases
/KittyKatt/screenFetch/archive/refs/tags/v*@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT@
$ uscan --no-download
usca
Hi,
Le lundi 19 septembre 2022 à 20:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
>
> Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream
> version with uscan. How do you deal with it?
It's not that recent ; here is a working example:
version=4
opts="\
dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg.*$//,\
filenamem
julien.pu...@gmail.com, le lun. 19 sept. 2022 18:00:37 +0200, a ecrit:
> Le lundi 19 septembre 2022 à 20:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> >
> > Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream
> > version with uscan. How do you deal with it?
>
> It's not that recent ; here is
On 2022-09-08 17:58:25 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> We cannot talk about PipeWire without mentioning its session manager.
> Thus, this change should go along the switch of the default session manager,
> i.e. from the deprecated pipewire-media-session to WirePlumber.
> We still use pipewire-media-ses
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 at 18:12:15 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> julien.pu...@gmail.com, le lun. 19 sept. 2022 18:00:37 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Le lundi 19 septembre 2022 à 20:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> > > Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream
> > > version with usc
Il giorno lun 19 set 2022 alle 18:12:15 +02:00:00, Samuel Thibault
ha scritto:
That works for the tags page, but not for the releases page... The
problem is that the tags page only contains snapshots of the
repository,
and not an autoconf-ed tarball. For instance since recently uscan
cannot
g
Le Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:13:30AM +0200, Gioele Barabucci a écrit :
> On 18/08/22 21:18, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> > Does anybody have objective objections against activating automatic
> > changelog trimming in binary packages?
>
> Hi,
>
> a couple of weeks since the initial email (thanks everyb
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
> in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against
> base-files. The dpkg version at the time just had included support for
> the DPKG_ROOT variable being set for maintainer scripts and we were
> excited to try out this new feature for creating f
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 18:54 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Hi, what I usually do with GitHub is to use its API, since it has the
> advantage of not breaking uscan when they do changes to the web UI.
Since the API uses pagination, this has the minor downside of making it
harder to use the uscan
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 20:50 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Recent changes in GitHub releases pages, I cannot check upstream
> version with uscan. How do you deal with it?
If you are using the automatically generated tarballs, then
just switching to the uscan git mode seems like the way to go.
For
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 18:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The problem is that the tags page only contains snapshots of the
> repository, and not an autoconf-ed tarball.
I think that is an advantage, because then you can be sure that you can
rebuild the autotools generated files from source duri
Hi Russ,
Quoting Russ Allbery (2022-09-20 00:05:23)
> Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
> > in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against
> > base-files. The dpkg version at the time just had included support for
> > the DPKG_ROOT variable being set for maintainer scripts and
Package: wnpp
Version: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
File: bug
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: domdf-python-tools
Version : 3.4.0
Upstream Author : Dominic Davis-Foste
* URL : https://
17 matches
Mail list logo
