Hello Debian developers,
I'm looking for 'the' timestamp of the Debian Archive, which will allow
me to virtually travel through time to re-generate a specific state of
Debian.
I've looked at the following places:
* http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/InRelease
File timestamp: 2022-0
Luca Boccassi writes:
> Nothing was ignored.
In the spirit of good faith I'll assume you meant "Nothing new was
ignored".
It's a fact that you are ignoring a few issues caused by usrmerge. This
is thoroughly documented in the BTS.
Arrogance is not on the bug list, but maybe it should be? It'
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:16:22AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I find it quite disappointing to read https://bugs.debian.org/848622 . I
> don't know if it is arrogance or ignorance, but this bug is undoubtedly
> caused by usrmerge:
>
> frtest2:~# ls -l /usr/bin/bash
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1283
On 2022-09-10 15:37 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> the transition to usrmerge as described in [1] is planned to start
> around 2022-09-15 (next Thursday).
>
> init-system-helpers 1.65~exp1 in experimental adds the new dependency on
> "usrmerge | usr-is-merged" and will be uploaded to unstable to start the
On Sep 18, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> So if you don't want another round of pointless discussions, then I
> suggest that you start working on those bugs now. That's the smart thing
In other words, you are saying that if we don't do what you want then
you will keep rehashing the same old arguments.
This
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:16 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> It's fine to oversell the advantages of usrmerge. It's not fine to
> try
> to hide the disadvantages.
Nothing is hidden, there's an open bug on the BTS, that's hardly a
secret hideout. As others have already explained (and as it was already
e
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:42 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2022-09-10 15:37 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
>
> > the transition to usrmerge as described in [1] is planned to start
> > around 2022-09-15 (next Thursday).
> >
> > init-system-helpers 1.65~exp1 in experimental adds the new
> > dependency on
>
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 12:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:42 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > This does not quite work as intended, because debootstrap's
> > simplistic resolver only ever looks at the first alternative in
> > dependencies, and so usrmerge gets installed anywa
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 13:20 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 12:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:42 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > This does not quite work as intended, because debootstrap's
> > > simplistic resolver only ever looks at the first alternative
Hi Roland,
Quoting Roland Clobus (2022-09-18 10:58:37)
> I'm looking for 'the' timestamp of the Debian Archive, which will allow me to
> virtually travel through time to re-generate a specific state of Debian.
Holger just suggested on IRC that I reply to your mail -- probably with my
metasnap.deb
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 12:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > I wrote a possible patch for debootstrap in [1], but being
> > debootstrap we might need to have it in stable as well. Maybe
> > someone has other ideas as well.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/ansgar/debootstrap/-/commits/ex
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 14:00 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 12:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > I wrote a possible patch for debootstrap in [1], but being
> > > debootstrap we might need to have it in stable as well. Maybe
> > > someone has other ideas as well.
> > >
> > > [1]:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> Quoting Roland Clobus (2022-09-18 10:58:37)
> > I'm looking for 'the' timestamp of the Debian Archive, which will allow me
> > to
> > virtually travel through time to re-generate a specific state o
On 2022-09-15 Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > A successful build is no guarantee for a working packaging though. e.g.
> > hugin errs out immediately when built with the newer wxWidgets.
> That is certainly true - and probably another good reason we don
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yadd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-libpq
Version : 1.8.12
Upstream Author : Brian M. Carlson
* URL : https://github.com/brianc/node-libpq
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
On 23 February 2022, I wrote this in https://bugs.debian.org/999363#35:
On 23 Feb 2022 17:21:29 +0100 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2021 15:40:21 +0100 Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Switching the default sound service is an option but should probably be
> > a project discussion and not a co
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 4:53 PM Diederik de Haas wrote:
> I think there currently aren't that many Debian users which do use PW and I
> think that switching the default audio provider in all of Debian (not just
> Gnome) is FAR more involved then the impression I got from this ML thread.
At least
Package: postgresql-pgml
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lev Kokotov
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, l...@hyperparam.ai
* Package name: postgresql-pgml
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : PostgresML Team
* URL : https://postgresml.org
* License : MIT
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Gelman
* Package name: golang-debian-vasudev-gospake2
Version : 0.2.1+git20210510.d916299-1
Upstream Author : Vasudev Kamath
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/vasudev/gospake2
* License : Expat or GPL-3
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Gelman
* Package name: golang-nhooyr-websocket
Version : 1.8.7-1
Upstream Author : Anmol Sethi
* URL : https://github.com/nhooyr/websocket
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Minimal and i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Gelman
* Package name: wormhole-william
Version : 1.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Peter Sanford
* URL : https://github.com/psanford/wormhole-william
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : End-to-en
21 matches
Mail list logo
