Dear all,
In the same theme as my earlier message [0], I like to ask you to please
spend some time triaging (and ideally solving) old RC bugs. Some
packages you may care about were removed from testing because the
maintainer didn't triage or fix the bug. And then there's key packages...
As a
Paul Said:
> On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 17:54 -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> > Specficially: in the case of a NEW binary upload, could a manual request
> > be
> > implemented (pick a different name if "give back" is not suitable) such
> > that it is thrown away and replaced by a buildd build?
>
> If yo
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 08:45:06AM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> > > Specficially: in the case of a NEW binary upload, could a manual request
> > > be
> > > implemented (pick a different name if "give back" is not suitable) such
> > > that it is thrown away and replaced by a buildd build?
> >
> >
Hi Paul,
Quoting Paul Gevers (2022-09-01 13:53:41)
> I am asking for help with investigating RC bug reports, judging
> severity, reproducing the issue, clarifying the problem, i.e. bug
> triaging of all RC bugs that haven't seen activity for a while and that
> are still affecting bookworm. Of c
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:08:20PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> > #960679 src:fontconfig
> > strict dependency of arch:any libfontconfig1 on arch:all
> > fontconfig-config going wrong
> > https://bugs.debian.org/960679
>
> fontconfig also has a second RC bug: #909750
>
> The
On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 at 13:53:41 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> #919914 gnome-settings-daemon
> gnome-tweaks now equates "don't suspend on lid close" with "don't lock on
> lid close" (security issue)
> https://bugs.debian.org/919914
Honestly, I don't think this one is really RC. The
bug reporter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Beaupre
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pubpaste
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Antoine Beaupré
* URL : https://gitlab.com/anarcat/pubpaste/
* License : AGPL
Programming Lang: Pytho
Package: general
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: velmory...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
Hi
Am 01.09.22 um 13:53 schrieb Paul Gevers:
#935182 libreoffice-core
Concurrent file open on the same host results file deletion
https://bugs.debian.org/935182
This one has been open so long, is forwarded upstream. Has to do with
samba *and* two persons on the same host doing it at the same t
Hi all,
On 01-09-2022 21:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This either should be ignored (like for bullseye) or downgrade, imho,
but I didn't do it myself. I don't think there's anything actionable
here...
On 01-09-2022 16:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> #919914gnome-settings-daemon
>> gnome-twe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com
Control: block 1006728 by -1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Package Name: libcairomm-1.16-1
Version: 1.16.1
Upstream Author: The cairomm Development Team
License: LGPL-2+
Programming
Hi,
Am 01.09.22 um 22:18 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 01-09-2022 21:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This either should be ignored (like for bullseye) or downgrade, imho,
but I didn't do it myself. I don't think there's anything actionable
here...
[...]
If I read these correctly, this is exactly the kind
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:45 -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> OK, so let's call it "bin nmu", then. And add the "+bN" version
> suffix.
As others said, binNMUs exist, but not for arch:all packages. Debian
doesn't yet have sourceful no-change rebuilds, so you have to manually
do a sourceful no-chang
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1257 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 176 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
Suddenly half the packages are marked AUTOREMOVE; many due to gcc-12 and zlib.
The related two bugs are months-old.
Why are things suddenly being removed??
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:04:38PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> Suddenly half the packages are marked AUTOREMOVE; many due to gcc-12 and
> zlib.
> The related two bugs are months-old.
>
> Why are things suddenly being removed??
Both are key packages per
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_pa
Hi
On 02-09-2022 07:27, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:04:38PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
Suddenly half the packages are marked AUTOREMOVE; many due to gcc-12 and zlib.
The related two bugs are months-old.
Why are things suddenly being removed??
Both are key packages p
17 matches
Mail list logo
