Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: alass
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : kaegi
* URL : https://github.com/kaegi/alass
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: vobsubocr
Version : 0.0~git20211108
Upstream Author : Eliza Velasquez
* URL : https://github.com/elizag
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:22:58 +0200
with message-id <20220630082257.dfe35x2cghs7a...@gpm.stappers.nl>
and subject line Too broad
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014029,
regarding invisible malicious unicode in source code - detection and prevention
to be marked as done.
This mean
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: rust-common-failures
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Eric Kidd
* URL :
https://github.com/emk/subti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: rust-vobsub
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Eric Kidd
* URL : https://github.com/emk/subtitles-rs/tr
On Jun 30, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to add support
> for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
Is supporting Chinese cryptography standards a goal for Debian?
If it is then they should be available to all packages, but if it is not
t
Hi,
This looks odd to me: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-failure
Latest news from 7 months ago was *removal* of the package, yet it is
seemingly still around.
What am I missing here?
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This looks odd to me: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-failure
>
> Latest news from 7 months ago was *removal* of the package, yet it is
> seemingly still around.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97329
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Owner: Michael Ikwuegbu
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-data-uri-to-buffer
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Nathan Rajlich (http://n8.io/)
* URL : https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-data-uri-to-buffer
*
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2022-06-30 14:50:05)
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This looks odd to me: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-failure
> >
> > Latest news from 7 months ago was *removal* of the package, yet it is
> > seemingly still
> "Stephan" == Stephan Verbücheln writes:
Stephan> As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to
Stephan> add support for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
It looked like there were two main points.
The first was in fact these ciphers.
I don't think that's a good
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: apprise
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Chris Caron
* URL : https://github.com/caronc/apprise
* License
On 6/30/22 16:16, Sam Hartman wrote:
However there are some other features from the ITP:
-Support NTLS (formal GM dual-certificate protocol) handshake processing,
according to GB/T 38636-2020
TLCP
-QUIC API support
Is it compatible with QuicTLS, which is another fork of OpenSSL? Some
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1272 (new: 7)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 176 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
14 matches
Mail list logo
