Correct version and revision of upstream packaged Debian package

2022-05-20 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
Hello, After reading couple times Debian Policy documentation packaging conventions and especially'5.6.12.2. Special version conventions' chapter. I'm bit confused about revision system. As MariaDB Foundation wants to provide upstream packages and currently naming scheme conflicts when upgrad

Re: Correct version and revision of upstream packaged Debian package

2022-05-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi Tuukka, * Tuukka Pasanen [2022-05-20 10:22]: Currently revision is for example: '10.6.7+maria~buster' which upgrades '10.6.7+maria~bullseye' which is lexical orderly lower than first one.To understand this bug report can be found here: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-28628 which conta

Re: Correct version and revision of upstream packaged Debian package

2022-05-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:22:55AM +0300, Tuukka Pasanen wrote: > After reading couple times Debian Policy documentation packaging conventions > and especially'5.6.12.2. Special version conventions' chapter. I'm bit > confused about revision system. As MariaDB Foundation wants to provide > upstream

Re: Correct version and revision of upstream packaged Debian package

2022-05-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2022-05-20 10:10:34) >> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:22:55AM +0300, Tuukka Pasanen wrote: > > Thing that like to ask should revision it be more like '+maria~deb11' or > > +mariadeb11. I understood that char '~' means it's build from upstream > > version control not from of

Re: Correct version and revision of upstream packaged Debian package

2022-05-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > It only makes sense to use '+maria~deb11' if you are going to > > also release '+maria' that needs to sort after all of those, or if you are > > using/going to use some '+maria+foo' scheme(s) that, again, need to sort > > after a

Re: Adding epoch to node-markdown-it to correct a wrong upstream version

2022-05-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, മേയ് 19 2022 at 04:39:23 വൈകു -05:00:00 -05:00:00, Richard Laager wrote: On 5/19/22 05:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: So current version in the archive is 22.2.3+dfsg+~12.2.3-1 The fixed version we want is 10.0.0+dfsg+~cs16.6.17-1 I have no dog in this fight as they say, but... How

Re: Adding epoch to node-markdown-it to correct a wrong upstream version

2022-05-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 20.05.22 um 11:23 schrieb Pirate Praveen: On വ്യാ, മേയ് 19 2022 at 04:39:23 വൈകു -05:00:00 -05:00:00, Richard Laager wrote: On 5/19/22 05:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: So current version in the archive is 22.2.3+dfsg+~12.2.3-1 The fixed version we want is 10.0.0+dfsg+~cs16.6.17-1 I have n

Debian: perl6 package is replaced by raku package

2022-05-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi Some of you may have wondered by perl6 package vanished from Debian Bookworm (aka testing). Belatedly following the rename of Perl6 language to Raku, I've renamed most Debian packages related to Raku. Among them, perl6 package was renamed raku. You can now install raku package to get rakud