Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader:
> Packages with incomplete or incorrect debian/copyright information
> currently would recieve a REJECT rather than acceptance. The proposal
> would not change that, just turn that REJECT into a bug report, which
> you could fix in a second upload to NE
On Sat, 2022-04-30 at 03:09 -0400, nick black wrote:
> currently, as far as i understand things, a REJECT can be issued
> for the first REJECT-worthy problem.
The same would occur under the proposal, except that there would
presumably be separate bug reports for separate issues.
> if resolving t
Hi Steve et al,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:27:46AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> TL;DR: firmware support in Debian sucks, and we need to change this. See the
> "My preference, and rationale" Section below.
Thank you for the excellent write-up.
> 5. We could split out the non-free firmware pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Matrix Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: neom
Version : 0.0~git20220427
Upstream Author : Antti Keränen
* URL : https:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vladimir Oltean
* Package name: tsn-scripts
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Vladimir Oltean
* URL : https://github.com/vladimiroltean/tsn-scripts
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Tool set for Tim
Hello,
On Sat 30 Apr 2022 at 07:44AM +08, Paul Wise wrote:
> It also means the ftpmasters can file separate bugs for each problem,
> rather than combining them all into one mail.
This would really slow things down; I don't think we could work that
way.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descripti
On Sat, 2022-04-30 at 14:20 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> This would really slow things down;
> I don't think we could work that way.
Using separate bug reports or not would of course be up to the person
filing them, but I expect the process could be automated well enough
that it wouldn't be much
Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader:
> > if resolving the resulting bug report is the bar needing clearing to
> > enter the archive, that does seem to require FTPmasters to create a
> > complete statement of REJECT-worthy problems in each uploaded
> > package, which seems like more work th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: python-ansible-compat
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Sorin Sbarnea
* URL : https://github.com/ansible/ansible-
On Sat, 2022-04-30 at 22:47 -0400, nick black wrote:
> i understand. i suppose that what i'm saying is it will probably
> be worthwhile to convey in Mentors etc. documentation that
> "resolving the bugs filed thus far [regarding the package in
> NEW] does not imply that no further bugs will be fil
Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader:
> I think the same problem and suggestions also apply with the current
> system of prods and rejects, so please do add or propose adding it in
> the appropriate documentation and templates. I will of course seek to
> preserve these statements if I end u
11 matches
Mail list logo
