Am 22. April 2022 07:18:50 MESZ schrieb Andreas Tille :
>Am Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:12:19AM -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>>
>> I've been a Debian Developer for quite some time and can usually manage to
>> figure out most tasks like this, and providing separate firmware to the
>> installer has compl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dynamic-motd
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Luc Didry
* URL : https://github.com/ldidry/dynamic-motd
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Pyth
Leandro Cunha writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:28 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> TL;DR: firmware support in Debian sucks, and we need to change this. See the
>> "My preference, and rationale" Section below.
>>
>> In my opinion, the way we deal with (non-free) firmware in Debian is a m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Wijnen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wij...@debian.org
* Package name: python-fhs
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Bas Wijnen
* URL : https://github.com/wijnen/python-fhs
* License : AGPL3+
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Wijnen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wij...@debian.org
* Package name: python-network
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bas Wijnen
* URL : https://github.com/wijnen/python-network
* License : AGPL3+
Pr
hi Steve,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:27:46AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> TL;DR: firmware support in Debian sucks, and we need to change this. See the
> "My preference, and rationale" Section below.
[...]
and anyone involved, especillay including those not listed here:
> Thanks to people who r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Wijnen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wij...@debian.org
* Package name: python-websocketd
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bas Wijnen
* URL : https://github.com/wijnen/python-websocketd
* License : AGPL3
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:52:04AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I agree with this option split, but that reminds me of a different
> procedural note.
>
> While I recognize and respect the desire to create a comprehensive ballot,
> I'm still going to advocate for proposing a GR only with the option
Hi,
I'm using NIS since 20+ years in a small network with about 60 computers.
Since I manage all computers and the physical network can be seen as secure
(I know it's not perfect secure) I do not need the additional crypto
features of NIS+ or LDAP, which would be overkill. All my users use
yppassw
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:07:52PM +0200, la...@debian.org wrote:
> I'm using NIS since 20+ years in a small network with about 60 computers.
> Since I manage all computers and the physical network can be seen as secure
> (I know it's not perfect secure) I do not need the additional cry
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:41:50 -0700, Steve Langasek
> said:
> If your users are using yppasswd on the NIS master for changing passwords,
> then evidently you are not relying on support for NIS in PAM. (yppasswd
> doesn't even link against libpam.)
Thanks for clarifying this
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:41:50 -0700, Steve Langasek
> said:
> NIS also dates from a period when rsh was considered acceptable, and unless
> I'm mistaken, has a comparable level of security. Allowing access to
> password hashes for users based on the IP of the machine you are querying
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:41:50 -0700, Steve Langasek
> said:
> If your users are using yppasswd on the NIS master for changing passwords,
> then evidently you are not relying on support for NIS in PAM. (yppasswd
> doesn't even link against libpam.)
Thanks for clarifying this
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I don’t want to discourage you from packaging this, but unless I’m mistaken,
> this will be at least the third Websocket client package for Python, and at
> least the third Websocket server in Python 🙂
Yes, I'm not surprised. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
