What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

Hi, I saw warning and it advised me to use dpkg-fsys-usrunmess: But now I see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008486 And even without that there are problems with that tool: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991218 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 12:03:55PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobiecki wrote: > Hi, > I saw warning and it advised me to use dpkg-fsys-usrunmess: > But now I see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008486 > And even without that there are problems with that tool: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: isa-support -- exit strategy?

On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 02:17:15PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:34:17PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * while a hard Depends: works for leafy packages, on a library it > > disallows having alternate implementations that don't need the > > library in question. Eg, li

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

On Apr 06, Krzysztof Sobiecki wrote: > Now what I'm supposed to do? Wait for dpkg-fsys-usrunmess-unmess? Install the usrmerge package and hopefully everything will be fixed. > Is my system broken because I have used dpkg-fsys-usrunmess(that dpkg > advised me to do?). Maybe. > As a Debian user I

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

Marco d'Itri writes: > Sorry, blame the dpkg maintainer. Is that how we discuss technical issues around here? Bjørn

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Sorry, blame the dpkg maintainer. > > Is that how we discuss technical issues around here? This is not a technical issue. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> > Sorry, blame the dpkg maintainer. >> >> Is that how we discuss technical issues around here? > This is not a technical issue. Ah, sorry. I mistook this for the "Discussion about technical development t

Re: debian-faq in NEW - or: remove documentation from the archive at all

Hi, On Sun, 2022-04-03 at 13:18 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > debian-faq is waiting in NEW queue for more than 4 months now (upload > is from 23.11.2021), with no visible activity from ftp-masters (and > even with no message at all!). > I pinged ftp-masters at the end of January, but got no react

Bug#1009056: ITP: puppet-module-voxpupuli-unbound -- Puppet module for unbound

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: puppet-module-voxpupuli-unbound Version : 5.0.0 Upstream Author : Voxpupuli * URL : https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-unbound * License : Apache

Bug#1009060: ITP: odr-padenc -- This is an encoder for Programme Associated Data

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Robin Alexander X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: odr-padenc Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli * URL : https://github.com/Opendigitalradio/ODR-PadEnc/ * License : GPL Prog

Re: What to do with merged /usr and dpkg-fsys-usrunmess

On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 03:04 -0700, Krzysztof Sobiecki wrote: > Hi, > I saw warning and it advised me to use dpkg-fsys-usrunmess: > But now I see: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008486 >From the link above: " Hi, the `dpkg-fsys-usrunmess` program should include a warning tha

Helping Ukraine with Debian

Hi! Has anyone thought about how to help out Ukraine by using Debian? Thinking about humanitarian relief and and other possibilities for communications. Is there any way I may be able to help out by remoting in? Any one got any verifiable contacts please? Thank you so much, Matt Grant