Hi,
[I've read the rest of the thread so far, answering the transition
question].
On 23-12-2021 00:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Is it normal and ok to upload a new major release of a library to
unstable, without either a) testing that reverse dependencies do not
break, or b) coordinating with
Hi Sandro!
* Sandro Tosi [2021-12-22 19:24]:
there's also a problem of resources: let's take the example of numpy,
which has 500+ rdeps. am i expected to:
* rebuild all its reverse dependencies with the new version
* evaluate which packages failed, and if that failures is due to the
new versio
Hi,
Am 23.12.21 um 10:44 schrieb Timo Röhling:
> That's true. However, I think it is reasonable to expect a
> maintainer to
> * look at the release notes for documented API breakage,
> * rebuild a few reverse dependencies (ideally the ones which
> exercise the most functionality, but a random pi
Hi,
Am 23.12.21 um 01:24 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> there's also a problem of resources: let's take the example of numpy,
> which has 500+ rdeps. am i expected to:
>
> * rebuild all its reverse dependencies with the new version
> * evaluate which packages failed, and if that failures is due to the
> n
Hi
A friendly reminder about the porter roll call for bookworm.
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 11:57, Graham Inggs wrote:
> We are doing a roll call for porters of all prospective release
> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of these
> architectures [1] and intend to continue for the
Le jeu. 23 déc. 2021 à 01:25, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
> > rebuild 500 packages takes hardware resources not
> every dd is expected to have at hand (or pay for, like a cloud
> account), so until there's a ratt-as-as-service
> (https://github.com/Debian/ratt) kinda solution available to every DD
If
Hi,
Le 23/12/2021 à 14:51, Stéphane Blondon a écrit :
> Le jeu. 23 déc. 2021 à 01:25, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
>
>>> rebuild 500 packages takes hardware resources not
>> every dd is expected to have at hand (or pay for, like a cloud
>> account), so until there's a ratt-as-as-service
>> (https://git
Hi,
On 23-12-2021 15:03, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
Isn't ci.debian.net doing automated builds with experimental version of
dependencies ?
ci.debian.net doesn't do builds except for autopkgtest that have the
"needs-build" restriction, which we discourage unless really needed.
Paul
OpenPGP_sign
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1244 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 184 (new: 1)
Total number of packages reques
9 matches
Mail list logo
