Thank you so much. Both helped. For another project, I am going for the -dev
package content. For this issue here, the source turned out to be much easier.
The result is a bit astonishing. I have not checked for false positives yet.
But the initial search gave 650 affected source packages. I exp
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 04:57 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 11:21:38 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 22:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 18:47:50 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > The bug is real, nobody doubts that - it has b
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 08:38 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Hi Svante,
>
> On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 23:22 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > I'm not sure he has the skill or experience enough to submit a patch to
> > dpkg. Complaining is much easier than proposing something constructive.
>
> I would like to re
Hello
My impression is that web based projects lean towards OpenSSL, while
for example the whole GTK/Gnome desktop stack is using GnuTLS (with
nettle/hogweed). So you will not get rid of either crypto stack.
Then I also think that OpenSSL 0.9.x/1.x and the new OpenSSL 3.x have
to be treated like
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 12:03:53 +, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> My impression is that web based projects lean towards OpenSSL, while
> for example the whole GTK/Gnome desktop stack is using GnuTLS (with
> nettle/hogweed). So you will not get rid of either crypto stack.
I believe the reason why
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-django-parler
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Diederik van der Boor
* URL : https://github.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:03:53PM +, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> Then I also think that OpenSSL 0.9.x/1.x and the new OpenSSL 3.x have
> to be treated like two completely different libraries. They have
> different licenses and intentionally broke APIs to end the mess that
> OpenSSL was.
When
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 10:55:26 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 12 November 2021 12:38:23 am IST, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >The golang-github-valyala-fasthttp package used to have date-based
> >release numbers (current Debian version 20160617-2). Upstream has
> >since switched to semver (latest ups
On 12/11/2021 16:26, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 10:55:26 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 12 November 2021 12:38:23 am IST, Guillem Jover wrote:
The golang-github-valyala-fasthttp package used to have date-based
release numbers (current Debian version 20160617-2). Upstream has
s
Stephan Verbücheln writes:
> Then I also think that OpenSSL 0.9.x/1.x and the new OpenSSL 3.x have to
> be treated like two completely different libraries. They have different
> licenses and intentionally broke APIs to end the mess that OpenSSL
> was. It is a situation like Python 2 and 3, we wil
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libfuture-io-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Future-IO
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: catatonit
Version : 0.1.7
Upstream Author : 2018 SUSE LLC
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/openSUSE/catatonit
* License : GPLv3
Description : Lightweight init implementation for containers
12 matches
Mail list logo
