Hi Paul,
Paul Sutton writes:
> Hi
>
> I installed Debian 11 on my new hard disk yesterday in preparation for
> the release, everything went very smoothly, I did manage to skip
> selecting a mirror (error on my part) but adding that manually worked
> fine after asking for help on IRC. Also good
On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 23:03:48 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> [a separate libsystemd-shared-249 .deb] would also mean, that on every
> new upstream release, systemd would have to go through NEW
It seems like we're rejecting a good technical solution because
social/organisational factors block it (
Am 14.07.21 um 12:59 schrieb Simon McVittie:
Would it be feasible for dak to have a list of binary package name
regexes mapped to a source package and a section/priority, and auto-accept
packages from the given source package that match the regex, assigning
the given section/priority, without man
Am 14.07.21 um 13:47 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 14.07.21 um 12:59 schrieb Simon McVittie:
Would it be feasible for dak to have a list of binary package name
regexes mapped to a source package and a section/priority, and
auto-accept
packages from the given source package that match the regex, as
* Simon McVittie [2021-07-14 11:59]:
Would it be feasible for dak to have a list of binary package name
regexes mapped to a source package and a section/priority, and auto-accept
packages from the given source package that match the regex, assigning
the given section/priority, without manual act
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:03:48PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Asking on #debian-systemd, Marco d'Itri suggested, that we move
> libsystemd-shared into a separate binary package. This would only help, if
> we moved libsystemd-shared into a Multi-Arch location (which means, we'd
> have to carry a
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> It seems like this would also be good for src:linux, where ABI breaks
> are often tied to security fixes that should enter the archive ASAP.
As security updates are hand approved, accepting by NEW does not help
that much.
Bastian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peymaneh Nejad
* Package name: golang-github-newrelic-go-agent
Version : 3.13.0-1
Upstream Author : New Relic
* URL : https://github.com/newrelic/go-agent
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peymaneh Nejad
* Package name: golang-github-stoewer-go-strcase
Version : 1.2.0-1
Upstream Author : A. Stoewer
* URL : https://github.com/stoewer/go-strcase
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : go
On 14.07.21 13:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 14.07.21 um 12:59 schrieb Simon McVittie:
Would it be feasible for dak to have a list of binary package name
regexes mapped to a source package and a section/priority, and
auto-accept
packages from the given source package that match the regex, assign
On 14/07/2021 11:25, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Sutton writes:
Hi
I installed Debian 11 on my new hard disk yesterday in preparation for
the release, everything went very smoothly, I did manage to skip
selecting a mirror (error on my part) but adding that manually worked
fine
Hi All
Am I right in thinking that xfce4-notes has been removed? I have
installed xfce4-goodies and it isn't installed.
apt search xfce4-notes
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
xfce4-goodies/testing,now 4.14.0 amd64 [installed]
enhancements for the Xfce4 Desktop Environment
Appears
Am 14.07.21 um 19:54 schrieb Paul Sutton:
Hi All
Am I right in thinking that xfce4-notes has been removed? I have
installed xfce4-goodies and it isn't installed.
From unstable/testing that is correct.
See
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xfce4-notes-plugin
specifically
https://tracker.debian.
Sean Whitton dixit:
>* #978636 move to merged-usr-only?
>
> We were asked to decide whether or not Debian 'bookworm' should
> continue to support systems which are not using the merged-usr
> filesystem layout. We decided that support should not continue beyond
> Debian 'bullseye'.
What? WHAT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peymaneh Nejad
* Package name: golang-github-google-cel-spec
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : https://github.com/google/cel-spec
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : go libra
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 19:54:56 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Sean Whitton dixit:
> >* #978636 move to merged-usr-only?
> >
> > We were asked to decide whether or not Debian 'bookworm' should
> > continue to support systems which are not using the merged-usr
> > filesystem layout. We decided t
Hi!
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 13:31:15 +0200, Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> FYI I just noticed another inconsistency: on my merged /usr systems
> (installed as such, not converted later w/ usrmerge), /etc/shells
> contains both /bin/ and /usr/bin/ paths for some shells, but not all
> (e.g. no /usr/bin/s
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 11:59:11 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 23:03:48 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > [a separate libsystemd-shared-249 .deb] would also mean, that on every
> > new upstream release, systemd would have to go through NEW
>
> It seems like we're rejecting a go
Am 09.07.21 um 14:24 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
Now let's do something stupid. Rename systemd to systemd-core (taking
all files with it, please refrain from discussing the name unless you
seriously consider doing this). Mark it Multi-Arch: allowed. Add a new,
empty binary package systemd. It is Multi
Guillem Jover dixit:
>I've been meaning to send a note about this for some time now, but
>as I feel it keeps getting ignored, it always seems a bit pointless.
Yeah, I saw this popping up multiple times in that bugreport ☹
>But in any case, given that merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs is not really
>su
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:22:59AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> You are right. Thinking more about this, splitting out libsystemd-shared as
> a Multi-Arch: same library will not help with
> SystemCallArchitectures=native, which is used by the services in
> systemd-{container,journal-r
21 matches
Mail list logo
