On Mi, 10 feb 21, 12:24:20, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:58:39PM -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > These have come to be expected to be on a typical Linux system by almost
> > every technically-knowledgeable Linux user. Locate does not satisfy
> > that criterion
> (I'm surp
On Lu, 08 feb 21, 23:13:10, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> The downside is, of course, the nightly updatedb job, which it is rare that
> anyone will notice, and the space used.
That's assuming the system is left running over night. It might be
noticeable if run on next system start.
Kind rega
On 10/02/2021 06:31, Zlatan wrote:
There is isenkram-cli which can detect and autoinstall the needed firmware.
Z
Ah thanks for this, I had never heard of that one, these tools need
to be better known.
Also vrms, lists any non-free software installed it may help anyone who
wants to k
Z> isenkram-cli
OK, but it seems to work differently that what I was thinking.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:31:43AM +, Paul Sutton wrote:
> ... I had never heard of that one, these tools need to be better known.
If Enrico Zini's and Enrico Rossi's 'debtags' is installed, then try
this command:
debtags search hardware::detection
That makes the tools better known.
Add
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes:
> Z> isenkram-cli
>
> OK, but it seems to work differently that what I was thinking.
I assume you are talking about isenkram-autoinstall-firmware? How so?
Perhaps the documentation could be improved to adjust the expectations,
or event the program could be adjusted...
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:49:51PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/9/21 7:40 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> >> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
> >> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a suitable
> >> normalizati
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, kar...@debian.org
* Package name: apertium-fra-frp
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Apertium Project Management Committee
* URL : https://www.apertium.org/
* License
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:47:12AM +, Phil Morrell wrote:
> To make that work as a default, there would need to be something like an
> --short-preferred-unless-existing-indent
sorry, going by the current default, that should be
--align-preferred-unless-existing-short
signature.asc
Descriptio
Marvin Renich writes:
> * Steinar H. Gunderson [210209 14:27]:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > And there are now also many non-technical Linux users who have never
>> > used a shell.
>>
>> Well, why do we include netcat, telnet or hdparm? lsof? pciutils?
>> t
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
> proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it moved
> us forward.
As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:21:36PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
> > proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it moved
> > us forward.
>
>
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:21:36PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> > I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
>> > proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 13:38 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Define "proper Unix"...
A system including Emacs. So we would need emacs at Priority: standard
or even important or required :]
Ansgar
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux)
> > is, maybe it's time for a src:proper-unix-system package for those who care?
> Define "proper Unix"...
well, I'd leave this to the people who care.
B
On 2021-02-09 22:12:31 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> "Steinar H. Gunderson" writes:
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:16:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Furthermore, any mechanism they use to configure one of them
> >> (e.g. for privacy or performance reasons) will not control the other,
> >> and again
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Faustin Lammler
* Package name: golang-github-pkg-diff
Version : 0.0~git20200914.5b29258-1
Upstream Author : Josh Bleecher Snyder
* URL : https://github.com/pkg/diff
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Desc
Russ Allbery:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
>> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
>> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a suitable
>> normalization, as that will involve re-indentation when keys change.
>> Instead, I propose this as starting
On 2021/02/10 15:16, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
>>> As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux)
>>> is, maybe it's time for a src:proper-unix-system package for those who care?
>>
>> Define "proper Unix"...
>
> The definition depends on whether you
Quoting Niels Thykier (2021-02-10 17:35:36)
> Russ Allbery:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> >
> >> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
> >> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a
> >> suitable normalization, as that will involve re-indentatio
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:02:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> >>...
> >> users on
> >> shared systems can expect it to be available without asking an
> >> administrator
> >> first. To me, locate has
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:02:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
users on shared systems can expect it to be available without asking
an administrator first. To me, locat
I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
found the same behaviour happens with the "amp" package (version
0.6.1-1) and the "spherepack" package (version 3.3~a1-4), which
suggests to me that the problem li
Hi,
Quoting Julian Gilbey (2021-02-10 22:51:39)
> I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
> to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
> found the same behaviour happens with the "amp" package (version
> 0.6.1-1) and the "spherepack" package (ve
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:15:38AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2021-02-10 22:51:39)
> > I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
> > to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
> > found the sam
Jonathan Carter dijo [Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 07:29:14PM +0200]:
> >> Define "proper Unix"...
> >
> > The definition depends on whether you are a longhair or shorthair.
>
> If you're a proper blue-haired person, then the only proper Unix is Debian.
Please do note that your definition might be of su
On 2021/02/10 23:51, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> creating
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/Src
> compile options: '-Ibuild/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/Src
> -I/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/numpy/core/include -I/usr/include/python3
27 matches
Mail list logo
