On 2021-01-08, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 21:15, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> In fact most of those packages would not be unreproducible if the
> environment would be the same as the original build. That includes the
> build path.
True, th
Hi,
I have a package `meteo-qt` which is broke due to the use of old API,
which is reported here:
https://bugs.debian.org/960451
There should be many existing cases, that external service the stable
package is using deprecates the old API, which in turn breaks the
package. Do we have documente
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: thola team
* Package name: thola
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : thola team
* URL : https://thola.io/
* License : BSD-2-Clause License
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A tool for monitoring and provisioning n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: root
* Package name: nesi
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : thola team
* URL : https://github.com/inexio/NESi
* License : BSD 2-Clause License
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Network Equipment Simulator (NES
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 12:15:22AM +0800, Yao Wei wrote:
> There should be many existing cases, that external service the stable
> package is using deprecates the old API, which in turn breaks the
> package. Do we have documented conventions that where the fixed package
> should be uploaded to: st
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 12:15 AM Yao Wei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a package `meteo-qt` which is broke due to the use of old API,
> which is reported here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/960451
>
> There should be many existing cases, that external service the stable
> package is using deprecates the
Note: in case we do not agree on this topic this will be the text I'll
send to the
tech-ctte.
Let me start by noting that I have nothing against reproducibility. In fact
quite the opposite: I love the idea... as long as it's properly implemented.
The problem here is that __FILE__ is a public, wel
Oh, I have sadly forgotten to mention another thing.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 15:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
According to:
Adrian Bunks mentions it in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876901#10
Holger Levsen in https://b
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, le sam. 09 janv. 2021 15:53:41 -0300, a
ecrit:
> # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
? My copy of C11 says
“
__FILE__ The presumed name of the current source file (a character string
literal)
”
that's not so well-defined. I would not expect it to nece
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:37:48PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, le sam. 09 janv. 2021 15:53:41 -0300, a
> ecrit:
> > # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
>
> ? My copy of C11 says
>
> “
> __FILE__ The presumed name of the current source file (a charact
Hi!
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 16:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:37:48PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, le sam. 09 janv. 2021 15:53:41 -0300,
> > a ecrit:
> > > # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
> >
> > ? My copy of C11 says
> >
Hi!
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 16:39, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, le sam. 09 janv. 2021 15:53:41 -0300, a
> ecrit:
> > # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
>
> ? My copy of C11 says
>
> “
> __FILE__ The presumed name of the current source file (a character stri
On 2021-01-09, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Oh, I have sadly forgotten to mention another thing.
>
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 15:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
>> # __FILE__ is a public, well defined API
>
> According to:
> Adrian Bunks mentions it in
> https://bugs.
Hi (again)!
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 17:53, Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-09, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Oh, I have sadly forgotten to mention another thing.
> >
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 15:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> > wrote:
> >> # __FILE__ is a public
On 1/9/21 12:22 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
implement a choice in this script.
>
> If this is too close to the freeze, I can temporarly remove `sdf` for
> `application/vnd.stardivision.math` and re-add it later.
sdf from Stardivision Math rings a bell as something I've used when I
was in Scho
On 2021-01-09, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Note: in case we do not agree on this topic this will be the text I'll
> send to the
> tech-ctte.
Thanks for taking the time to draft some text. If we can come closer to
agreement on the proposed text, that would probably take a bit of th
On Saturday, January 9, 2021 12:49:50 AM CET Guillem Jover wrote:
> Disabling this option in these few places gives you room to possibly
> look for a fix, or not, w/o the pressure of the freeze, while not
> affecting the other packages.
Hi Guillem
Can you provide some kind of hook in the environm
17 matches
Mail list logo
