Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:47:16 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 4/8/20 10:44 PM, Peter Silva wrote: >> doesn´t this whole discussion just mean that k8 should just not be in >> Debian? > >IMO no. It means that if we have enough packaging resources (which >probably we don't, I can't tell), We don't. T

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:21:35 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >On 09.04.20 08:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> As a user, I'd prefer Kubernets to be in Stable if possible. I'd be one >> of these users who don't care about the latest shiny feature, and prefer >> something stable, supported for YEARS to co

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:58:54 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: >On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:36:17PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>I don't agree with this *at all*. It is not in the interest of our users >>to be forced to update the software they use for their infrastructure >>every few months. > >Isn't t

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:36:22 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 4/8/20 10:58 PM, Michael Stone wrote: >> Or, if they're not clear about what >> adopting this tool means, I agree that isn't in their interest for them >> to see that there's a debian package and be fooled into thinking it >> doesn't req

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Friday, 10 April 2020 5:43:57 PM AEST Marc Haber wrote: > That a big package in Debian stable that has been abandoned by > upstream months or even years ago is actually supported is fairy tale. Let's remember that Kubernetes was never in "stable" to begin with. This is not to say that it could

Bug#956384: ITP: prinseq-lite -- PReprocessing and INformation of SEQuence data (lite version)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team * Package name: prinseq-lite Version : 0.20.4 Upstream Author : Robert Schmieder * URL : http://prinseq.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Perl Description : PReproces

Bug#956387: ITP: opensmtpd-filter-senderscore -- OpenSMTPD filter integration for SenderScore reputation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ryan Kavanagh * Package name: opensmtpd-filter-senderscore Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Name * URL : https://github.com/poolpOrg/filter-senderscore * License : ISC Programming Lang: Go Description : OpenSMTP

Bug#956388: ITP: golang-github-avast-apkverifier -- APK Signature verification in Go. Supports scheme v1, v2 and v3 and passes Google apksig's testing suite.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hans-Christoph Steiner * Package name: golang-github-avast-apkverifier Version : 0.0~git20200217.aa28c80-1 Upstream Author : Avast * URL : https://github.com/avast/apkverifier * License : LGPL-3.0 Programming Lang: Go

django-bootstrap4 -- Bootstrap 4 integration for Django

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Owner: Javier Ruano * Package name: django-bootstrap4 Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Dylan Verheul * URL : https://github.com/zostera/django-bootstrap4 * License : BSD Programming Lang: python Description : Bootstrap 4

ITP: django-bootstrap4 -- Bootstrap 4 integration for Django

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Owner: Javier Ruano * Package name: django-bootstrap4 Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : Dylan Verheul * URL : https://github.com/zostera/django-bootstrap4 * License : BSD Programming Lang: python Description : Bootstrap 4

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

Dmitry Smirnov writes: > Let's remember that Kubernetes was never in "stable" to begin with. > This is not to say that it couldn't be useful in "testing", "unstable" > or even "experimental". Many packages that may be considered not > suitable for "production" are nevertheless useful. Speaking

django-leaflet -- django-leaflet allows you to use Leaflet in your Django projects.

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Owner: Javier Ruano * Package name: django-leaflet Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : Makina corpus * URL : https://github.com/makinacorpus/django-leaflet * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python, Javascript Description :

ITP: folium -- Make beautiful maps with Leaflet.js & Python

* Package name: folium Version : 0.10.1 Upstream Author : Rob Story * URL : https://github.com/python-visualization/folium * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python, Javascript Description : Make beautiful maps with Leaflet.js & Python folium builds on t

ITP: folium -- Make beautiful maps with Leaflet.js & Python

* Package name: folium Version : 0.10.1 Upstream Author : Rob Story * URL : https://github.com/python-visualization/folium * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python, Javascript Description : Make beautiful maps with Leaflet.js & Python folium builds on t

ITP: folium -- Make beautiful maps with Leaflet.js & Python

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Owner: Javier Ruano * Package name: folium Version : 0.10.1 Upstream Author : Rob Story * URL : https://github.com/python-visualization/folium * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python, Javascript Description : Make beauti

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:12 PM Russ Allbery wrote: > Dmitry Smirnov writes: > > > Let's remember that Kubernetes was never in "stable" to begin with. > > > This is not to say that it couldn't be useful in "testing", "unstable" > > or even "experimental". Many packages that may be considered not

Bug#956417: ITP: parasail: Pairwise Sequence Alignment Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nilesh Patra X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: parasail Version : 2.4.1 Upstream Author : Jeff Daily * URL : https://github.com/jeffdaily/parasail * License : B

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On 4/10/20 9:50 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > A package without upstream support is bound to be a zombie. There's many examples of this in Debian. It all depends, and you cannot make a generality like this. On 4/10/20 9:43 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:47:16 +0200, Thomas Goirand > wro

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Saturday, 11 April 2020 4:45:08 AM AEST Peter Silva wrote: > Debian policy is there to shape packages so they fit into stable. If we > "know" that a package will never make it into stable, is Policy relevant? Of course policy is relevant. Debian is not only "stable" but also "testing", "unstab