On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:22:18 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov
wrote:
>On Thursday, 26 March 2020 7:27:33 PM AEDT Marc Haber wrote:
>> I still wouldn't dare pulling testing or unstable packages to
>> production systems. It's like a worst-of-all-worlds approach.
>
>Not at all. Packaging is an extra layer of sa
On 27.03.20 01:57, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:30 PM Christian Kastner wrote:
>
>> [Well, technically, you could use your own lawyer to perform the due
>> diligence and have them submit any necessary changes to the BTS, but I
>> think it's safe to assume that that is a theoretical
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: qtpim-opensource-src
Version : 5.0~git20190618.8fec622c
Upstream Author : Chris Adams
* URL : https://code.qt.io/qt/qtpim.git
* License : LGPL-2.1 (with exception) or GPL-3
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Package name: libopenaptx
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream-Contact: Pali Rohár
URL : https://github.com/pali/libopenaptx/
License : LGPL2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Audio Processing Technology code
On 3/26/20 11:52 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> Applying the Debian "library" policy on go code is imho impossible -
>> there are no sonames, often no proper releases. The way how Debian
>> packages source code does not fit for go.
>
> The way how Golang community handled dependencies was insane for
On Friday, 27 March 2020 7:08:35 PM AEDT Marc Haber wrote:
> Many upstreams deliver .deb packages of their current releases in
> noticeably high quality from a Debian point of view. One should look
> at them before putting them in production.
I have a very different observations regarding upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Ward
Package name : bubblemail
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Razer
URL : https://bubblemail.free.fr/
License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : An extensible mail notification service
B
7 matches
Mail list logo
