Re: Lintian is complaining about udebs?

2020-03-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2020-03-21 00:39 -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > Just checking --- this looks like a Really Bad regression in Lintian > 2.57.0, correct? Seems so, I can can confirm it with Lintian 2.58.0. > E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: debian-changelog-file-missing > E: e2fsprogs buildinfo: field-too-long Instal

Bug#954406: ITP: parlatype-libreoffice-extension -- Control Parlatype from LibreOffice

2020-03-21 Thread Gabor Karsay
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gabor Karsay * Package name: parlatype-libreoffice-extension Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : Gabor Karsay * URL : http://www.parlatype.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Control Parlat

Fwd: bind9_9.11.17+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, This seems like a regression to me, but before I fill a bug with lintian, is there anything I can do to my packages to fix this? Maybe I am doing something wrong and new lintian caught that... Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý Begin forwarded message: > From: Debian FTP Masters > Date: 21 March 202

Re: Fwd: bind9_9.11.17+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-21 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 3/21/20 1:29 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > This seems like a regression to me, but before I fill a bug with lintian, is > there anything I can do to my packages to fix this? It's fixed in lintian (2.58.0), see: https://bugs.debian.org/954146 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D

Re: bind9_9.11.17+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Oh thanks, so I’ll just wait a bit until it’s deployed on the ftp-master queue. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org > On 21 Mar 2020, at 13:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On 3/21/20 1:29 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> This seems like a regression to me, but before I fill a bug with lintian

Re: Lintian is complaining about udebs?

2020-03-21 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:09:41AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2020-03-21 00:39 -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > > Just checking --- this looks like a Really Bad regression in Lintian > > 2.57.0, correct? > > Seems so, I can can confirm it with Lintian 2.58.0. Oops, sorry, this first showe

Re: Python related autopkgtest anti-pattern

2020-03-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 1:41:14 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, March 18, 2020 6:32:22 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm currently reviewing some of the autopkgtest regressions that are > > currently blocking python3-defaults with python3.8 as the default python3 > > from migr

Is comma operator defined by POSIX and supported by dash?

2020-03-21 Thread Bagas Sanjaya
Hello, According to [Bashism Wiki](https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism): The comma operator is widely supported by almost everything except dash and yash -- even posh and Busybox. In ksh93 however, it conflicts with the decimal radix in locales where it's used in floating points instead of perio

Re: Is comma operator defined by POSIX and supported by dash?

2020-03-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2020-03-22 Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Hello, > According to [Bashism Wiki](https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism): >> The comma operator is widely supported by almost everything except dash >> and yash -- even posh and Busybox. In ksh93 however, it conflicts with >> the decimal radix in locales whe