Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin
* Package name: python-protego
Version : 0.1.15
Upstream Author : Anubhav Patel et al.
* URL : https://github.com/scrapy/protego
* License : BSD-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : pure-Py
Hi,
at the last tech-ctte meeting the question came up of whether there's
a general rule in Debian about libraries/modules depending (or not)
on the corresponding interpreters for their implementation language.
It's not obvious to me what the ideal setup here should be, when there
are no other re
> On 17 Nov 2019, at 22:39, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> - for PHP, there apparently used be a draft policy but it's gone with Alioth
> now.
> The remnants I could find [5] don't mention package dependencies. Looking at
> the
> archive, I see pretty much uniform dependencies on php-common, apparently
Niko Tyni writes:
> It's not obvious to me what the ideal setup here should be, when there
> are no other reasons for such a dependency than 'need an implementation
> of the language the library is written in'.
I think there can be another reason: "needs a minimum version of the
interpreter langua
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-unicode-utils
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Stefan Lang
* URL : http://github.com/lang/unicode_utils
* License : BSD-2-clause
Descript
Holger wrote:
>
>so at dc19 we came up with the idea of having a Debian event pre- or
>post-FOSDEM, an event like DebCamp or maybe a bug squashing party, so
>mostly self/unorganized.
>
>The only thing we would need is suitable room, and probably someone
>paying for it.
>
>And we'd need to agree on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
Control: tag + moreinfo
Package name: emacs-wgrep
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Masahiro Hayashi
URL : https://github.com/mhayashi1120/Emacs-wgrep
License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs LISP
Descript
7 matches
Mail list logo