Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: >> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: >> >>> Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots >>> yet? >> >> Something like docker-buildpackage ? > > AFAICT, docker-buildpackage d

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

Bernd Zeimetz writes: > On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: >>> Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots yet? >>> AFAIK sbuild has had this support for a whil

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

Hi, On 7/11/19 5:48 PM, Kyle Edwards wrote: > The demand is there. APT-style repositories aren't going away any time > soon. definitely not, I think the amount of various apt repositories will rise drastically. >From the container world most people are in the need of a stable base image for their

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:03:06PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > I'm wondering if there is something Debian can do to be even more > successful in the container world. Like regular releases of a container > base image from testing. The amount of packages that needed for that is > limited, the numbe

source only upload with git-buildpackage

Hi, I'm struggling with it for a while now and I couldn't find the solution. I have a package maintained with git-buildpackage. And now, that I "cannot" upload binary packages I tried to compile the new version with the option to create a source-only changes file too. But for some reason that chan

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

On 05.10.19 19:48, Attila Szalay wrote: > Hi, > > I'm struggling with it for a while now and I couldn't find the > solution. I have a package maintained with git-buildpackage. And now, > that I "cannot" upload binary packages I tried to compile the new > version with the option to create a source

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

Hi, Quoting Nicholas D Steeves (2019-10-05 18:41:55) > Bernd Zeimetz writes: > > On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >>> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: > Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:06:56PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote: > that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read > the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages? To make sure they build correctly. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

On 05.10.19 21:48, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:06:56PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote: >> that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read >> the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages? > To make sure they build correctly. > Ok, che

[What happened to CUT?] Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

Bernd Zeimetz writes: > I'm wondering if there is something Debian can do to be even more > successful in the container world. Like regular releases of a container > base image from testing. The amount of packages that needed for that is > limited, the number of RC bugs is probably low enough mos

Re: Discussion tooling (was: Bits from the DPL (August 2019))

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 14:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > > > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating > > > separate discussion threads when the topic changes. > >

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote: > >> that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read > >> the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages? > > To make sure they build correctly. > > > Ok, checked the calender, it is not April 1. I

Re: Discussion tooling (was: Bits from the DPL (August 2019))

On 2019-10-05 22:13:49 +0100 (+0100), Samuel Henrique wrote: [...] > And the problems with relying on the tree view of email subthreads > have already been exposed here as it depends on people formatting > the subthread in a specific way, which does always happens. [...] Not necessarily. For me at

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

On 05.10.19 23:14, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote: that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages? >>> To make sure they build correctly. >>>

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

On 10/5/19 12:25, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > On 10/5/19 3:31 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:49 PM Enrico Weigelt wrote: >>> On 24.07.19 08:17, Marc Haber wrote: >>> Do we have a build technology that uses containers instead of chroots yet? >>> >>> Something like docke

Re: Bug#941708: ITP: nextcloud-server -- Nextcloud folder synchronization tool (server)

You should fix the project license on GitLab, right now it's showing all rights reserved. That should be in the project settings somewhere... Also, have you seen ? That appears like it'll eventually allow a non-downloader package.

Re: source only upload with git-buildpackage

That option means that the system will create not only the binary .amd.changes but another changes too which contains only the source packages. And I would like to use this method to be sure the package compiles, to be able to run the lintian against the package and even be able to test it before t