On 8/27/19 8:52 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Alf" == Alf Gaida writes:
>
>
> Alf> There are things i really like about PRs or MRs - they can be
> Alf> reviewed, commented, changed without problems and fast.
>
> And as Sean pointed out, it's hard to understand the history of the
> chan
On 8/27/19 5:52 PM, Alf Gaida wrote:
> Nicer would be "lowest common nominator" but "stone age" describe the
> process of sending patches via BTS very well. Upps, sorry, not only the
> process, but the BTS also.
Exactly. Working with the BTS is a waste of time compared to github or
gitlab work
Hello.
Thanks to you guys, it worked.
It actually did all of what you suggested. ;)
I removed my package, and reuploaded it as dmagnetic_0.17-1. This time,
it worked. Now, I have to find a sponsor. Any volunteers?
Hi.
Your upload of the package 'dmagnetic' to mentors.debian.net was
successfu
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 12:32:08PM +0200, dettus wrote:
> Now, I have to find a sponsor. Any volunteers?
Please read the text you copied below.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Yes.
Been there. Done that. So far: No sponsors.
Thomas
On 9/1/19 12:34 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 12:32:08PM +0200, dettus wrote:
Now, I have to find a sponsor. Any volunteers?
Please read the text you copied below.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: sdrangel
Version : 4.11.8
Upstream Author : f4exb
* URL : https://github.com/f4exb/sdrangel
* License : GPL-3.0
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Control: block 939122 by -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: serialdv
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : f4exb
* URL : https://github.com/f4exb/serialDV
* License : GP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Control: block 939122 by -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: dsdcc
Version : 1.8.6
Upstream Author : f4exb
* URL : https://github.com/f4exb/dsdcc
* License : GPL-3.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Control: block 939122 by -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libperseus-sdr
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Microtelecom s.r.l.
* URL : http://microtelecom.it/perseus/
* Lic
> "Bernd" == Bernd Zeimetz writes:
Bernd> On 8/27/19 8:52 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> "Alf" == Alf Gaida writes:
>>
>>
Alf> There are things i really like about PRs or MRs - they can be
Alf> reviewed, commented, changed without problems and fast.
>>
>> A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
* Package name: python-pypathlib
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https://github.com/nschloe/pypathlib
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Polygon package fo
On 9/1/19 2:52 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Actually, no, people like Sean do care about this.
> They want a record of the discussion.
The record of this discussion is on salsa, not in the BTS.
With the difference that you are actually able to review a merge request
including its changes and discu
Le 01/09/2019 à 11:02, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>
>
> On 8/27/19 5:52 PM, Alf Gaida wrote:
>> Nicer would be "lowest common nominator" but "stone age" describe the
>> process of sending patches via BTS very well. Upps, sorry, not only the
>> process, but the BTS also.
>
> Exactly. Working with t
On 9/1/19 6:41 PM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> I find both arguments quite valid:
> - The BTS is more future proof, stuff on it will probably last longer
> than whatever is on Salsa currently.
Why? There is no real reason to remove MRs or bug reports in salsa after
some time.
> There are bugs in t
Hi Pirate, and other interested parties,
On 09-08-2019 08:22, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 9 1:16:23 AM IST, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I can already trigger all the autopkgtests in unstable for packages
>> that
>> are in experimental, so if you interested in this, please contact me.
>> T
Le 01/09/2019 à 19:15, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>
>
> On 9/1/19 6:41 PM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
>> I find both arguments quite valid:
>> - The BTS is more future proof, stuff on it will probably last longer
>> than whatever is on Salsa currently.
>
> Why? There is no real reason to remove MRs or b
On Aug 30, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's not particularly rare for me to poke through other distros package
> patches when I'm trying to figure out how to solve a problem. I suspect I'm
I would even say that maintainers who do not periodically review what
other distributions do with their own
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 2 1:26:51 AM IST, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Hi Pirate, and other interested parties,
>
>On 09-08-2019 08:22, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 9 1:16:23 AM IST, Paul Gevers
>wrote:
>>> I can already trigger all the autopkgtests in unstable for packages
>>> that
>>> are i
18 matches
Mail list logo
