On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> > On 23 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> > probably everythi
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> > probably every
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Fellow devs,
>
> bear with me if the topic of the upcoming european copyright law (aka
> §13) has been discussed in other mailing lists. As being responsible for
> screenshots.debian.net I honestly am a bit worried about the
> impli
❦ 24 mars 2019 09:42 +01, Geert Stappers :
> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=888743;filename=init-functions.diff;msg=37
> ?
Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
Hi,
Quoting Geert Stappers (2019-03-24 09:53:58)
> > bear with me if the topic of the upcoming european copyright law (aka §13)
> > has been discussed in other mailing lists. As being responsible for
> > screenshots.debian.net I honestly am a bit worried about the implications.
> > As usual??? IAN
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:42 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > > do not care abo
Hi Ondřej,
On 3/23/19 2:26 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
> patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
>
I already did. See the bug reports for lsb and opensmtpd. I
stumbled over apt-
Le dimanche, 24 mars 2019, 09.42:12 h CET Geert Stappers a écrit :
> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=888743;filename=ini
> t-functions.diff;msg=37 ?
I have now uploaded src:lsb to experimental with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
* Package name: picotls
Version : 0.0.20190320
Upstream Author : Kazuho Oku
* URL : https://github.com/h2o/picotls
* License : MIT, CC0
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for TLS 1.3 (R
❦ 24 mars 2019 14:40 +01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud :
>> Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
>> is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution.
>
> Vincent: what scenario did you have in mind?
For the first part, any daemon chrooting (like HAProxy, lldpd). For the
10 matches
Mail list logo
