On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 05:52:31PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > I think some other questions should be considered first. Did Debian protect
> > from these attacks in the past? The answer is clearly no. Now, should we
> > break
> > the systems o
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 1:45 AM Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while trying to get the nocheck build profile working, I stumbled over
> some discrepancies between
>
> * Debian Policy §4.9.1,
> * dpkg-buildflags (behaviour + man page), and
> * lintian's long description of the tag
> override
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:26 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:01 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
> trying this:
>
> $ python evil_linker_torture.py 3000 400 200 50
>
> running with "make -j4" is going to take a few hours.
ok so that did the trick:
Hi,
I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
I've found the following strange hit:
udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources
where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ;
source |version|
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
>
> udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources
> where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and rele
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 4:42 AM Wookey wrote:
>
> On 2019-01-04 20:16 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Quite a few packages have jquery/ embedded in documentation generated by
> > javadoc. This yields to
> >
> > Could openjdk perhaps build a package that would ship jquery/ in a know
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:49 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 PM Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > I thought I'd post here to see if anyone had any information first.
>
> I noticed that this idea came up in 2010 and 2014 so I think we never
> had x-www-browser, only www-browser.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maxime Schmitt
* Package name: nvtop
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Maxime Schmitt
* URL : https://github.com/Syllo/nvtop
* License : GPL, MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Interactive NVIDIA GPU process m
On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 at 13:20:14 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I could add a sensible-x-www-browser to be more nice to our user to
> sensible-utils
Please use xdg-open instead of reinventing it. Unlike the alternatives
system, xdg-open respects the per-user configuration written by our
default
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:19:13PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 at 13:20:14 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > I could add a sensible-x-www-browser to be more nice to our user to
> > sensible-utils
>
> Please use xdg-open instead of reinventing it. Unlike the alternatives
>
Hello
I've uploaded a new RC version of libtommath in experimental. Please test at
will.
Hopefully, the non-RC version will be ready before the freeze.
All the best
Dod
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:46 AM Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:19:13PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Please use xdg-open instead of reinventing it. Unlike the alternatives
> > system, xdg-open respects the per-user configuration written by our
> > default GNOME desktop (and h
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 13:20 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I could add a sensible-x-www-browser to be more nice to our user to
> sensible-utils
We already have a x-www-browser alternative, so sensible-x-www-browser
would just duplicate that and is thus not needed.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 13:20 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> I could add a sensible-x-www-browser to be more nice to our user to
>> sensible-utils
>
> We already have a x-www-browser alternative, so sensible-x-www-browser
> would just duplicate that and is thus not needed.
No
Hi,
Could someone tell me that, at InRelease file in repository,
is "Valid-Until:" not mandatory or not?
--
Hideki Yamane
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:23 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Could someone tell me that, at InRelease file in repository,
> is "Valid-Until:" not mandatory or not?
It definitely isn't mandatory, Debian stable does not use it:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/Release
http://ftp.debian.org/
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:26:42 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> It definitely isn't mandatory, Debian stable does not use it:
Thanks, but at some releases like stretch doesn't have "InRelease"
file but have "Release" file as
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/InRelease
and http://ftp.debian.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:40 AM Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Thanks, but at some releases like stretch doesn't have "InRelease"
> file but have "Release" file as
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/InRelease
> and http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/Release
Release and InRelease are i
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:51:13 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> Release and InRelease are identical apart from the location of the
> OpenPGP signature (detached vs inline). Valid-Until is optionally
> present in both of them.
Thanks again, now it's clear for me :)
--
Hideki Yamane
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: =?utf-8?b?QW5kcmV3IExlZSAo5p2O5YGl56eLKQ==?=
* Package name: ruby-feature
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : mgsnova
* URL : https://github.com/mgsnova/feature
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description :
Hi,
My name is James. I have identified your website as a good fit for our
business.
We would like to work out a deal that enables us to place relevant content on
your site with a Do-Follow Link.
If this is something that you would be interested in please reply to this email
so that we can di
21 matches
Mail list logo
