Hi,
> as announced in our talk at debconf'18 [1] we intend a MBF about wrong
> redirections in maintainer scripts. In general these are of the form
>
> foo 2>&1 1> /dev/null
>
> Here it was probably intended to send both stderr and stdout to /dev/null.
> In reality the effect of this is to send
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Dosch
* Package name: go-sendxmpp
Version : 0.0~git20180804.acb3759-1
Upstream Author : Martin Dosch
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch-guest/go-sendxmpp
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Hi,
a year ago, on August 4 2017, intrigeri wrote:
> tl;dr: I hereby propose we enable AppArmor by default in testing/sid,
> and decide one year later if we want to keep it this way in the
> Buster release.
Here are some data points relevant to this decision making process.
I think we're in a goo
Dear all,
I followed this tutorial:
https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2015/07/27/dh-make-golang.html
But, obviously as I am no Debian member, I can not process the last
step: `ssh git.debian.org "/git/pkg-go/setup-repository go-sendxmpp
'Packaging for go-sendxmpp'"`
How should I continue
Am 04.08.2018 um 14:49 teilte Martin Dosch mit:
Hi Martin,
I followed this tutorial:
https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2015/07/27/dh-make-golang.html
But, obviously as I am no Debian member, I can not process the last
step: `ssh git.debian.org "/git/pkg-go/setup-repository go-sendxmpp
'Pa
On 2018-08-04 14:49, Martin Dosch wrote:
> How should I continue? Zip the folder and send to a member of the go-team?
The best thing is probably to make yourself a guest account at
https://salsa.debian.org/ and host your packaging repository
there. Both the Go team (https://salsa.debian.org/go-tea
Guillem Jover writes:
>
>> [c] Level of activity should be defined in favor of the maintainer if in
>> doubt. A maintainer may ask for help or welcome a NMU. This counts as
>> activity with respect to salvage criteria. If a package lacks uploads,
>> there is no visible bug triaging, and - if app
gregor herrmann writes:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 17:40:49 +0800, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
>> A package is eligible for salvaging if it is in clear need of some love
>> and care, i.e. there are open bugs, missing upstream releases, or there
>> is work needed from a quality-assurance perspective; AND the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kurt Kremitzki
* Package name: opencamlib
Version : 2018.08
Upstream Author : Anders Wallin
* URL : https://github.com/aewallin/opencamlib
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski
* Package name: boohu
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Yon
* URL : https://download.tuxfamily.org/boohu/index.html
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Break Out Of Hareka's Undergrou
Hello everyone,
tl;dr: at the BoF the proposal seems to be uncontroversial at the
session. So we will go forward with discussing it and propose a patch
to e.g dev-ref (if we're still aiming for dev-ref then)
Generally, the people at the BoF seemed to be supportive of the
proposal, but a few thin
11 matches
Mail list logo
