Bug#897158: ITP: node-nodedbi -- libdbi interface for Node.js

2018-04-29 Thread Xavier Guimard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Xavier Guimard * Package name: node-nodedbi Version : 1.0.12 Upstream Author : Daniel O'Neill * URL : https://github.com/danieloneill/nodedbi * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: Javascript Description : libdbi in

what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, First of all thank you all the fine people who have contributed to packaging and maintaining the whole suit of apt, aptitude, apt-get, dpkg low and high-level variety of tools in Debian for system administration and making good choices. Please CC me if you any thoughts as although I'm s

Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi shirish, > Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file > path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude Unless you are requesting a distribution-wide move from ~/.foo to XDG ~/.config/foo, filing a wishlist bug against the aptitude package would seem a more appropriate

Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 29/04/2018, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi shirish, > >> Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file >> path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude > > Unless you are requesting a distribution-wide move from ~/.foo > to XDG ~/.config/foo, filing a wishlist bug

Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Shirish, > Had already done it, see #894332 , But don't think it's not going to > go anywhere from the last two times :( as it seems the effort to do it > is not the worth the effort as shared by the maintainer. > > At least I tried, well guess just will have to learn to live with it. Thank you

Bug#897190: ITP: wemux -- multi-user Tmux made easy

2018-04-29 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni * Package name: wemux Version : 3.2.0 Upstream Author : Matt Furden * URL : https://github.com/zolrath/wemux * License : MIT Programming Lang: Shell Description : multi-user Tmux made easy

Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread shirish शिरीष
Reply in-line :- On 29/04/2018, Chris Lamb wrote: > Shirish, > Chris, >> Had already done it, see #894332 , But don't think it's not going to >> go anywhere from the last two times :( as it seems the effort to do it >> is not the worth the effort as shared by the maintainer. >> >> At least I t

Re: what do people feel think of changing the configuration file path from ~/.aptitude/config to ~/.config/aptitude

2018-04-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Shirish, > As far as 'not getting immediately my way' the immediacy would have > been if I had filed a bug yesterday and bugged today, then your > statement would have been valid. It is true that there has been no activity on #894332 for a few weeks but I am unsure what you intended to productiv

Bug#897201: ITP: empty-epsilon -- a spaceship bridge simulator game

2018-04-29 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni * Package name: empty-epsilon Version : 2018.02.15 Upstream Author : Daid & Nallath * URL : https://daid.github.io/EmptyEpsilon/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C++ & Lua Description : a

Bug#897202: ITP: seriousproton -- C++ game engine implemented atop SFML

2018-04-29 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Braud-Santoni * Package name: seriousproton Version : 2018.02.15 Upstream Author : Daid & Nallath * URL : https://github.com/daid/SeriousProton/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : game eng

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

2018-04-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Hey Scott, (Somehow this got wedged in my 'Drafts' folder. Please don't read anything into the delay in replying...) > Fundamentally not a lintian warnings are created equal. Some have > solid foundation in Debian project consensus and policy. Others are > nothing more than the opinions of t

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

2018-04-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, April 30, 2018 06:07:19 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > Hey Scott, > > (Somehow this got wedged in my 'Drafts' folder. Please don't read > anything into the delay in replying...) > > > Fundamentally not a lintian warnings are created equal. Some have > > solid foundation in Debian project con