Hello fellows,
we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer)
using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1":
* gcc-4.7
> mv: cannot stat 'stamps/07-install-stamp': No such file or directory
> debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk:362: recipe for target
> 'stamps/08
On 14929 March 1977, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer)
> using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1":
> With all the reproducible build stuff going on, I think it would be nice
> if someone™ can also donate CPU time to check
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer)
> using "-j8".
Is that a dpkg-buildpackage option? It's documented to fail on certain
packages, you need to use -J instead, and maintainers need to certify that
a pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carsten Schoenert
* Package name: ngspice-dfsg
Version : 27
Upstream Author : various (mainly Holger Vogt, Paolo Nenzi, Robert
Larice)
* URL : http://ngspice.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD-3-clause,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> In practice, Berkeley DB is a core component of most *nix distros.
> Debian popcon indicates that libdb5.3 is installed on ~80% of the
> computers which report to popcon.
I wonder how many of this ~80% is only due to having installe
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:39:29AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > In practice, Berkeley DB is a core component of most *nix distros.
> > Debian popcon indicates that libdb5.3 is installed on ~80% of the
> > computers which repo
2018-01-26 12:02 GMT+01:00 Colin Watson :
>> Finding someone performing the daunting task of actually switching code,
>> documentation and existing databases over on the other hand… I at least
>> don't see me enthusiastically raising my arm crying "let me, let me, …".
>
> I don't blame you!
Might
On 26.01.2018 00:59, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> ---
> Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3 at a
> wide scale ? And if so, how to optimize resource usage in general ? :)
> ---
I asked 389-ds-base upstream about their plans, and got this draft plan
of getting rid of bdb f
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:37:08PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> > we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer)
> > using "-j8".
> Is that a dpkg-buildpackage option? It's documented to fail on certain
> pac
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 07:02:52AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> That is interesting. I build using gbp/cowbuilder and so I set these
> environment variables:
>
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=`nproc`" DH_VERBOSE=1
>
> I was not previously aware of the distinction between -j and -J for
> dpkg
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer)
> using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1":
> IMHO with todays multi-core CPUs -jX is a must:
> - If I rebuild the full distribution, building mu
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:07:25PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> So this is _already_ done; at most individual packages might not use this
> option, either via an explicit opt-out, or by having old crufty packaging.
I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.a
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10.
Well start with
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version.html
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 07:38:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:07:25PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > So this is _already_ done; at most individual packages might not use this
> > option, either via an explicit opt-out, or by having old crufty packaging.
> I wonde
Is there a way to rectify the wrong description i sent to the bug tracking
system . Bug#888475
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 08:47:45PM +0530, Manas Kashyap wrote:
> Is there a way to rectify the wrong description i sent to the bug tracking
> system . Bug#888475
Specify as the first line[s] of your mail to 888...@bugs.debian.org :
Control: retitle -1 ITP: my-doodad: new swanky short desc
The res
Jeremy Bicha:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10.
>
> Well start with
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version.html
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha
>
For the curious:
* Dep
Hi Ryan,
On 1/26/18 1:02 AM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > the vast majority of the ~170 reverse dependencies of libdb5.3
> > listed by `apt-cache rdepends libdb5.3` on sid will require (much)
> > more work to get rid of that dependency, wi
Hi Marco,
On 1/26/18 1:46 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 25, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > Several days ago, jmm from the security team suggested that I start
> > a discussion on debian-devel about Berkeley DB, which has known
> > security issues, because doing so may enable finding a consensus on
Hi Timo,
On 1/26/18 12:21 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 26.01.2018 00:59, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > ---
> > Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3
> > at a wide scale ? And if so, how to optimize resource usage in
> > general ? :)
> > ---
>
> I asked 389-ds-base upstre
Hi Scott,
On 1/26/18 7:05 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:59:06 PM Lionel Debroux wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > ---
> > Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3
> > at a wide scale ? And if so, how to optimize resource usage in
> > general ? :)
>
Hi,
On 1/26/18 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > In practice, Berkeley DB is a core component of most *nix distros.
> > Debian popcon indicates that libdb5.3 is installed on ~80% of the
> > computers which report to popcon.
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 23:59:06 +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> Several days ago, jmm from the security team suggested that I start a
> discussion on debian-devel about Berkeley DB, which has known security
> issues, because doing so may enable finding a consensus on how to move
> away from it i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Scott Talbert
* Package name: wxpython4.0
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Robin Dunn
* URL : https://www.wxpython.org/
* License : wxWindows Library License
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python interfa
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:49:41PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
>...
> On 1/26/18 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>...
> > Finding someone performing the daunting task of actually switching
> > code, documentation and existing databases over on the other hand… I
> > at least don't see me enthus
25 matches
Mail list logo
