Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shirish Togarla
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-redirect
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com
)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/is-redirect
* License
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Two months ago, Steve wrote:
> > * enable it for installation via d-i by default. At installation
> [it being unattended-upgrades]
> What's the status of this? I do not like this idea, it interacts
> poorly with desktops which h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aditya Neralkar
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-timed-out
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Vsevolod Strukchinsky
* URL : https://github.com/floatdrop/timed-out#readme
* License : Expat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yogiraj Kulkarni
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-caller
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Erik Toth
* URL : https://github.com/totherik/caller
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaSc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yogiraj Kulkarni
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-require-inject
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Rebecca Turner (http://re-becca.org)
* URL : https://github.com/iarna/require-inject#readme
* Lic
Thibaut Paumard writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> I'm not interested at the moment in dgit or other wrappers because
> 1- they seem to me to add complexity to the process;
> 2- I prefer to understand what I'm doing.
Those are good reasons. (And I'm trying to make them a b
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:29:12PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jan 06 2017, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that any time
> > (not chosen by the user) is ok to do an upgrade.
>
> If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that users will
>
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 12:04:54PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Now we can't be the Universal OS, no matter what we do :-)
Distro development is difficult, let's go shopping.
Sarcasm aside, here's a summary of the situation, as I understand it.
tldr: let's not despair, we have a mostly technical
http://agranfoundation.org/cxdcmvy.php
*Every man loves two women;the one is
the creation of his imagination an d the other is not yet born.Lowell Agin
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:26:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 06 ജനുവരി 2017 02:46 വൈകു, Philip Hands wrote:
> > The fact that they all seem to be trimming off the FIX_ME that npm2deb
> > includes for them, and are thus also removing the explanation of what
> > Node.js is, seems like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: =?utf-8?b?Q2hhbmdaaHVvIENoZW4gKOmZs+aYjOWArCk=?=
* Package name: golang-github-nwidger-jsoncolor
Version : 0~20161210
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2016 Niels Widger
* URL : https://github.com/nwidger/jsoncolor/
* License
Hi Praveen,
Having seen the unedifying thread on pkg-javascript I can see why you
might be rather defensive on this subject, but this thread was intended
as constructive criticism.
The packages do actually need a long description to make it through the
NEW queue, so this is really just about when
On ശനി 07 ജനുവരി 2017 09:30 വൈകു, Philip Hands wrote:
> I've responded to a few of these ITPs and have found the responses I've
> received suggest that you've chosen your recruits well, so it strikes me
> as a shame that they are underselling themselves by submitting ITPs in
> this state.
I did no
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:32:45PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 01/05/2017 02:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Riku Voipio (2017-01-05 12:53:16)
> >> Vast majority of users would only install this via dependencies. It's
> >> hardly a node-specific problem that debian package searc
On Jan 06 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Nikolaus,
>
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:59:40PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Jan 05 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:39:25PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> >> But, as far as I can tell, doing this work up-front is much eas
On Jan 07 2017, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Well, just to say, I'm personally quite happy with '3.0 (quilt)'. I try
> to maintain all my packages in git in unapplied state, because in my
> opinion this is the sensible thing to do. When I do a
> git diff upstream master
> I want to see only debian/
Le 07/01/2017 à 22:10, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> On Jan 07 2017, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> Well, just to say, I'm personally quite happy with '3.0 (quilt)'. I try
>> to maintain all my packages in git in unapplied state, because in my
>> opinion this is the sensible thing to do. When I do a
>> g
(truncated) from debian-deve-changes@l.d.o:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:33:44PM +, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Source: ncc
> Version: 2.8-2.1
> Changes:
> ncc (2.8-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
UNRELEASED? how did that even work?
--
cheers,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:50:23PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > UNRELEASED? how did that even work?
>
> It happens every so often.
>
> The archive software looks at the Distribution field of the .changes,
> and doesn't care at all about what's in Changes (i.e. what's in
> d/changelog).
> Usua
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:44:08PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (truncated) from debian-deve-changes@l.d.o:
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:33:44PM +, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Source: ncc
> > Version: 2.8-2.1
> > Changes:
> > ncc (2.8-2.1) UN
Hello Nikolaus,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 01:08:02PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Aeh, what?
>
> If you make changes to debian/, you need only 'git commit'.
>
> If you change something in the upstream source (aka, add a new patch),
> the "dance" is:
>
> $ gbp pq import
> $ # make changes
> $ git
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:56:27PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> still surprised this aint caught by lintian-auto-rejects from ftp
> master.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677673
While on it, you might find also this one interesting:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:11:02PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677673
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755420
ouch, *g*, thanks!
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 07:32:12PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:32:45PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > On 01/05/2017 02:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Quoting Riku Voipio (2017-01-05 12:53:16)
> > >> Vast majority of users would only install this via dependencies
Hi,
Quoting Thibaut Paumard (2017-01-07 07:12:59)
> I manage my patches using quilt. I would really prefer if sbuild et al.
> would revert the patches after building by default, but that's life. I
> respect that other people have other views.
you could always file a wishlist bug against sbuild wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nupur Malpani
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-home-path
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Lloyd Brookes <75po...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/75lb/home-path#readme
* License : Exp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yashashree Kolhe
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-progress-stream
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : freeall
* URL : https://github.com/freeall/progress-stream#readme
* License : BSD-2-Clau
27 matches
Mail list logo
