On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker)
>
> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already
> maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
No, you are not maintaini
On 09/23/2016 03:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's
> something different than building packages for some of the ports
> architectures.
> If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you
> gain som
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: widgetsnbextension
Version : 1.2.6
Upstream Author : Python Development Team
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/widgetsnbextension
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: ipywidgets
Version : 5.2.2
Upstream Author : IPython Development Team
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ipywidgets
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : IPython HT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lev Lamberov
* Package name: powerline
Version : 2.4
Upstream Author : Donald Ephraim Curtis
* URL : https://github.com/milkypostman/powerline
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : Emacs v
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere
* Package name: librsb
Version : 1.2.0-rc5
Upstream Author : Michele Martone
* URL : http://librsb.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Recursive Sparse Blocks
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
* Package name: azure-cli
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Microsoft Corporation
* URL : https://github.com/Azure/azure-cli
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Command-line to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
Control: block 838708 by -1
* Package name: python-adal
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Microsoft Corporation
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/adal/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
Control: block 838708 by -1
* Package name: python-applicationinsights
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Microsoft Corporation
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/applicationinsights
* License : MIT
Russ Allbery schreef op 21-09-2016 19:56:
Xen writes:
I would simply suggest that in principle you keep bugs open until it
no
longer exists. But that you introduce a different open state other
than
closed that will communicate "has been looked at, is not capable of
being solved right now". T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alf Gaida
* Package name: pavucontrol-qt
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Hong Jen-Yee (PCMan)
* URL : https://github.com/lxde/pavucontrol-qt
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : pavucontrol-qt is
Ben Finney schreef op 22-09-2016 2:27:
Xen writes:
I would simply suggest that in principle you keep bugs open until it
no longer exists.
One reason bug reports get closed is because the report is far too
vague
to even know *whether* it exists, or under what conditions it would be
consider
Bart Schouten writes:
> I think the point that people are trying to get across is that a lot of
> what you say Russ feels like excuses.
An excuse is when you know you should do something but aren't going to do
so, and are trying to justify that decision to oneself. That's not the
disagreement h
On 2016-09-23 at 19:12, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Schouten writes:
>
>> I think the point that people are trying to get across is that a
>> lot of what you say Russ feels like excuses.
>
> An excuse is when you know you should do something but aren't going
> to do so, and are trying to justify
The Wanderer writes:
> While I see the perspective which leads you to that statement, I don't
> think that's strictly correct.
> The way I usually put it is that "if you expect to be excused because of
> it, it's an excuse".
> Some excuses are valid, mind. That doesn't mean they aren't excuses.
Bart Schouten writes ("Re: Debian does not have customers"):
> You know probably just as well as I do that often times when you mention
> the slightest of difficulties with any software package to anyone on any
> Linux mailing list or forum, the first thing they often tell you is
> "Have you fil
16 matches
Mail list logo
