On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> where the second field is not a valid package name. Can someone please
>> tell me if this is expected or if I should inform someone of the
>> problem?
>
> Bug #833695 was already fi
On 03/09/16 14:48, Thomas Pierson wrote:
Hi,
I'm also interested because I use freeradius at work and on some other
non-profit projects too.
I already maintain some packages in Debian as a DM only but I don't have
a lot of experience.
So Martin, Vito, please tell me if you need more help and ho
Hi,
I'm also interested because I use freeradius at work so if you want I'm
happy to help.
Il 04/Set/2016 12:57, "Martin List-Petersen" ha
scritto:
> On 03/09/16 14:48, Thomas Pierson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm also interested because I use freeradius at work and on some other
>> non-profit proj
Adam D. Barratt:
> I'm sure I'm not the only one irritated by this,
Then you should be looking at the Debian software that drives
https://lists.debian.org/ , which seriously mucks up subject processing,
and not at us poor users who are long-suffering under it. Debian
software gets References
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:59:47PM +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> If you had directed your irritation to the bug area for the Debian software
> rather than at the poor Debian software end-users, you would have found that
> several bugs about some of these very things were filed years ago
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 12:59 +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
>
> > I'm sure I'm not the only one irritated by this,
>
> Then you should be looking at the Debian software that drives
> https://lists.debian.org/ , which seriously mucks up subject processing,
Strangely,
On 2016-09-04 at 07:59, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
>
>> I'm sure I'm not the only one irritated by this,
>
> Then you should be looking at the Debian software that drives
> https://lists.debian.org/ , which seriously mucks up subject
> processing, and not at us poor user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:05:06 +0200
ni...@thykier.net wrote:
> Like last release, we are doing a roll call for porters of all release
> architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of the [release
> architectures] for the entire lifetime of
Simon McVittie:
This can already work. If you put XDG_RUNTIME_DIR in user programs'
environment, and arrange for your favourite service manager to make a
dbus-daemon (or something else that speaks the same protocol) listen
on $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/bus before any user process would try to connect
t
XDG Base Directory Specification:
If $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set applications should fall back to a
replacement directory with similar capabilities and print a warning
message
Simon McVittie:
Are you saying that if XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set, D-Bus client
libraries should choose some arbit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl
* Package name: gnome-autoar
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Ting-Wei Lan
* URL : https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-autoar/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Archives integr
Folks,
could you elaborate a bit more why you are forcing all Build-RDeps to
change B-D to default-libmysqlclient-dev instead of just changing the
semantics of libmysqlclient-dev?
I understand the default-mysql-client and default-mysql-server, but I
don't understand the change from libmysqlclient
12 matches
Mail list logo
