Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-luminescence
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Sebastian Kreutzer
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Luminescence
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description
Would it be possible/reasonable (at least for stretch) to have the
installer detect this and ask "your hardware appears to be too new for
this release, would you like to enable -backports?"
On 04/07/16 23:38, Ben Hutchings wrote:
As I understand it, xserver-xorg-video-modesetting should be use
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 08:25 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Have you reported this bug (with the full warnings)? If not, please
> do so.
I haven't. If I got a response at all to "My monitor doesn't work" it
looks to me it would be: compile latest source with instrumentation
turned on and send
On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
> unresponsive host:
>
> # cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non
On 07/05/16 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
> unresponsive host:
>
Sorry, this was supposed to go to debian-user.
Regards
Harri
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04):
>> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
>> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
>> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
> > of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on
> > the Skylake platform. Th
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>>
>>> Is anybody else interested in helping? Thoughts/comments?
>
>Yes, it's a project I'm already working on ;-) Is this project a
>candidate for a new Debian Team?
I guess so, yes. :-)
>> 2. Does it have to be called "jessi
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:07 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > > A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
> > > of very recent amd64 machines too,
Hi Martin,
On 07/05/16 10:09, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't mention klecker-ftp anywhere in my config files.
>> Its not on the round-robin list for ftp.debian.org either:
>>
>> # host ftp.debian.org
>> ftp.debian.org has address 130.239.18
On 07/04/2016 03:01 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just
> like a normal jessie release, but with a
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:07 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We're getting to the point where there's a fairly pressing need for
> > arm64 - the more useful hardware is starting to get a wider distribution
> > and we don't really have an
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:11:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The point has been made that there are lots of other clients in Debian main
> that only talk to a single, proprietary server implementation; so if snapd
> did only talk to the Canonical store, I believe its placement in main would
>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2016 03:01 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> > similarly to what we did in the etch days.
Hi Steve,
On Mon Jul 04, 2016 at 14:01:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
> of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on
> the Skylake platform. Those are the only two architectures I'm
> thinking of sup
2016-07-05 7:43 GMT-03:00 Jose R R :
> > Why would you call it "Jessie + 1/2"? Wouldn't it be a better idea
> Well IBM set a precedent for that: OS/2.
> Accordingly, Jessie BP could be called Jessie/2 ;-)
Well, that would be a half Jessie, not Jessie and a half, right? We could
use 3Jessie/2 o
]] Martin Bagge / brother
> On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> > # apt-get update
> > Err:1 http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid InRelease
> > Could not connect to klecker-ftp.debian.org:80 (130.89.148.12),
> > connection timed out [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::173 80]
> > Reading package lists.
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 08:25 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Would it be possible/reasonable (at least for stretch) to have the
> installer detect this and ask "your hardware appears to be too new for
> this release, would you like to enable -backports?"
It might be, but it's going to be hard t
Hi,
here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
that systemd received since its version 215-17+deb8u4 (the one
available from jessie) you might wanna give it a try.
The backport is based on what will be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alba Crespi
* Package name: r-cran-nmf
Version : 0.20.6
Upstream Author : Renaud Gaujoux, Cathal Seoighe
URL : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NMF/
* License : GPL (>=2)
Programming Lang: R
Description :
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
> somewhat sporadically maintained.
Do you have any more details on that? Does a better alternative exist?
I still have hopes that someday the d-i mirror question becomes an
expert-level question for peop
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I still wonder if a fork of the last linux:src=4.4, updated to bring
> it to linux-4.4.14 would be a lower support burden? I'm still finding
> that there are a fair number of issues reported with 4.5.x and 4.6.x
> on various mai
On 2016-07-04 16:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm happy to announce that I finally managed to set up the first sparc64
> porterbox. It's available to all DDs and is called notker.debian.net [1].
>
> The machine is using the same setup that Debian uses for its other
> porterboxes
Hi Mika,
* Michael Prokop [2016-07-05 17:34 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
>
> If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
> that systemd received since its version 215-17+deb8u4 (the one
> available from jessie)
Holger Levsen (2016-07-05):
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I still wonder if a fork of the last linux:src=4.4, updated to bring
> > it to linux-4.4.14 would be a lower support burden? I'm still finding
> > that there are a fair number of issues reported
Josh,
On 5 July 2016 at 14:53, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
>> somewhat sporadically maintained.
>
> Do you have any more details on that?
There was a discussion[1] on "debian-project" mailing list a few
month
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> Right. It seems I have a different opinion here than the project has
> in general, and because of that, I think it's as OK for snapd to be in
> main as those other packages. And becaus snapd now has, or is getting,
> support for other server sides, and there's a free on
Steve,
On 07/04/2016 10:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
of very recent amd64 machines too.
ppc64el port would take benefit from it also, since, there were many new
kernel features that made linux after 3.16.
On Tue 05 Jul 2016 at 20:46:07 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> * Michael Prokop [2016-07-05 17:34 +0200]:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
> >
> > If you're interested in all the new features, bugfixes and changes
> > tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Biedl
* Package name: libdate-holidays-de-perl
Version : 1.7
Upstream Author : Martin Schmitt
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Holidays-DE/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-rlumshiny
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Christoph Burow
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RLumShiny
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : GNU
* Brian [Tue Jul 05, 2016 at 08:16:34PM +0100]:
> On Tue 05 Jul 2016 at 20:46:07 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Michael Prokop [2016-07-05 17:34 +0200]:
> > > here at DebConf I've been working on a backport of systemd for jessie.
[...]
> > Are you aware of the 'Thinking about a "jessie a
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
>> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
>> similarly to w
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Mon Jul 04, 2016 at 14:01:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
>> of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on
>> the Sk
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 06:11:24PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> I still wonder if a fork of the last linux:src=4.4, updated to bring
>> it to linux-4.4.14 would be a lower support burden? I'm still finding
>> that there are a f
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 04:15:36PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>Steve,
>
>On 07/04/2016 10:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
>>of very recent amd64 machines too.
>
>ppc64el port would take benefit from it also, since, there were man
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The minimum required version in the glibc is something configurable at
> build time (to some extents, the absolute minimum is 2.6.32 for glibc
> 2.21). This configure how much compatibility glue is used to workaround
> the missing sy
Hi!
On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 17:29:32 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The targets are "officially" mandatory and have been since 3.9.4
> (released in September 2012). Currently lintian and dpkg still forgive
> their absence to avoid auto-rejects and FTBFS bugs.
> However, Guillem and I would like to
Hi!
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 02:06:56 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> I'm very glad for the automatic debug packages, but I wonder if I'm
> doing something wrong since I get this warning:
>
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package foo-dbgsym listed in files list
> but not in control info
>
> The pa
Hi!
I'd like to obsolete bzip2 (and lzma) as .deb compressors when building
binary packages. dpkg-deb currently emits warnings, this would turn them
into errors. For lzma it's fine in Debian as the archive has never
accepted them. For bzip2 there are currently 31 source packages that
produce some
Hi!
I'd like consider switching dpkg-deb --uniform-compression by default,
so that both control.tar and data.tar members use the same compression,
which currently would be xz (or gzip with -Zgzip).
This would give us more uniform and smaller packages. I think the d-i
people wanted something like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ruben Undheim
* Package name: openems
Version : 0.0.34
Upstream Author : Thorsten Liebig
* URL : http://openems.de
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Electromagnetic field solver using the FDT
42 matches
Mail list logo
