Re: Packaging of static libraries

2016-04-11 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > What uses require PIC static libraries that cannot be satisfied by building > > -static --whole-archive ? > > https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#DEB_BUILD_HARDENING_PIE_.28gcc.2Fg.2B-.2B-

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2016-04-10 03:55, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> >> while i really appreciate all the work you are doing for the gitlab >> package, i honestly have the feeling that you are trying to make too >> many decisions on behalf of the system administrator who wants to >> install gitlab. > > I just want the s

Re: Priorities overrides? Extra?

2016-04-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> Question is wich information they cover. For me, "optional" means: > >> conflict free by policy. > > You are still mixing two completely separate things. > Which? The existence of the override mechanism and the optional vs extra pr

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 11 1:35:39 PM IST, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote: >Isn't it how every other service doing it? > >yes sure. > >but if i install other web-services (e.g. php-horde) they don't bother >me with setting up an enrypted webservice. >the only reasonable package that should sug

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 11 avril 2016 15:18 +0530, Pirate Praveen  : > 2.automating ssl was not possible before letsencrypt. Now you just > need to click/press yes button to get an encrypted service running. > > And for those who do not want it, the default is 'no' for both ssl and > letsencrypt. > > It would be a

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Pirate Praveen > 1.Most people in the world including myself thought encryption was an > optional thing two years back. Is that why we've been pushing for SSH over telnet for twenty years now? > 2.automating ssl was not possible before letsencrypt. Now you just > need to click/press yes butt

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2016-04-11 11:48, Pirate Praveen wrote: > It would be a good time to add letsencrypt support to php-horde and every > other service dealing with sensitive data like passwords. no, seriously not. i am all for having all web traffic encrypted. that's why the web-server package *may* push for enc

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 11 3:35:56 PM IST, Vincent Bernat wrote: >In this case, this could be done centrally, for example in the >letsencrypt package. With debhelper integration like we do for init scripts or systemd. If debian/.letsencrypt is present, it should take care of the remaining. -- Sent f

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:18:58PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > 1.Most people in the world including myself thought encryption was an > optional thing two years back. > > 2.automating ssl was not possible before letsencrypt. Now you just need to > click/press yes button to get an encrypted serv

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 11 3:44:09 PM IST, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >Is that why we've been pushing for SSH over telnet for twenty years >now? I should clarify, importance of https and end to end encryption was not considered widely. There were a minority pushing for encryption. But is is more mainstre

Bug#820689: ITP: subuser -- Run programs on Linux with selectively restricted permissions

2016-04-11 Thread Stanislas Leduc
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stanislas Leduc Hey dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "subuser" * Package name: subuser Version : 0.5.6-1 Upstream Author : Timothy Hobbs * URL : http://subuser.org/ * License : LGPL-3 Section

Re: Priorities overrides? Extra?

2016-04-11 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2016-04-10 19:50, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: Maybe it's time to acknowledge that it's mostly busy work at this point and packages could be authoritative for this kind of information (and handle NEW with a simple list of packages). I expect the ftp

Bug#820737: ITP: node-tar-pack -- Pack and unpack a Node.js module

2016-04-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jérémy Lal" * Package name: node-tar-pack Version : 3.1.3 Upstream Author : Forbes Lindesay * URL : https://github.com/ForbesLindesay/tar-pack * License : BSD-2-Clause Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : P

Bug#820738: ITP: tiles-autotag -- Automatic tag generation for Apache Tiles

2016-04-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bourg * Package name: tiles-autotag Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-autotag * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description

Re: gitlab package (was Re: Opt out style recommends)

2016-04-11 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:18:58PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> 1.Most people in the world including myself thought encryption was an >> optional thing two years back. >> >> 2.automating ssl was not possible before letsencrypt. Now you