Cetak Kalender 2015 Murah

Pusatpercetakan.com | Cetak Kalender 2016 www.pusatpercetakan.com Copyright @2015 Pusatpercetakan.com Our mailing address is: Jl. Swadaya Raya No 1762, Jelambar, Jakarta Barat 11460 Indonesia Phone : +6221 569 56789 Email

Bug#804847: ITP: drf-generators -- management command to generate DRF Serializers, Views, and URLs

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: drf-generators Version : 0.2.7 Upstream Author : Tobin Brown * URL : https://github.com/Brobin/drf-generators * License : Expat Progra

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

Marc Haber wrote: On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:58:13 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: >[ ? 11/11/2015 18:14 ] [ ? Marc Haber ] >> Once and for all we're doing _SOMETHING_ right, let's keep it that >> way. >I do not agree that we are doing something exactly r

Re: debian.org RTC: announcing XMPP, SIP presence and more

Hi Daniel, On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:05:16PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Dear Developers, [marketing snipped] While all this irrelevant information about metcalfe's law and federation and whatnot is very interesting, this mail lacks one key data point: How does one use the damn XMPP service?

Re: RFQ-FCG113464 Urgent Inquiry

Dear Supplier, Could you send us your quotation including the shipping charge for the attached purchase order. please clarify to us the availability of these items in your company stock and the delivery time. We highly appreciate your prompt answer because this is very important: Thanks for you

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

[ ⏰ 11/11/2015 23:28 ] [ ✎ Jeroen Dekkers ] > Documentation should be put in /usr/share/doc, not in /etc. I always > find it annoying to have to review lots of comment changes in > configuration files during upgrades instead of simply the options that > actually changed. With big config files it of

Re: debian.org RTC: announcing XMPP, SIP presence and more

Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > How does one use the damn XMPP service? Set an RTC password using db.debian.org. Your account username is wou...@debian.org. (Replace wouter with your LDAP username if you're not wouter). Your password is the one you set at

Config upgrade with cme (was Re: (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.)

Hello Vincent On Wednesday 11 November 2015 17:11:13 Vincent Danjean wrote: > I looked at [2] (cme seems really powerfull to offer automatic > upgrade/merge of config files). I've two questions after reading the wiki: > > 1) I vaguely recall recommendations/requirement that a package > should

Re: (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:52:06PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > A file delivered by a package in /etc automatically becomes a conffiles. If you use debhelper. (not saying you shouldn't, but hey, sometimes being pedantic is good) -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate a

Re: debian.org RTC: announcing XMPP, SIP presence and more

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:51:29 + "Iain R. Learmonth" wrote: > > How does one use the damn XMPP service? > > Set an RTC password using db.debian.org. > > Your account username is wou...@debian.org. (Replace wouter with your > LDAP username if you're not wouter). > > Your password is the one y

Re: debian.org RTC: announcing XMPP, SIP presence and more

"Iain R. Learmonth" writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> How does one use the damn XMPP service? > > Set an RTC password using db.debian.org. > > Your account username is wou...@debian.org. (Replace wouter with your LDAP > username if you're not wo

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

On Nov 11 2015, Marc Haber wrote: > Once and for all we're doing _SOMETHING_ right, let's keep it that > way. I think what Debian is doing right is that it tracks and notifies about changes in configuration files. But that doesn't mean we have implemented it in the right (or best) way. I think t

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

Josselin Mouette wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:58:13 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq > wrote: > >[ ? 11/11/2015 18:14 ] [ ? Marc Haber ] > >> Once and for all we're doing _SOMETHING_ right, let's keep it that > >> way. > >I do not agree

Re: [HEADSUP] dropping xconsole support from default rsyslog configuration

Am 08.11.2015 um 22:55 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I therefor plan to drop this rule from the default rsyslog.conf and ship > it as an example in /usr/share/doc/rsyslog/examples/xconsole.conf which > users can drop into /etc/rsyslog.d/. > I'll update the instructions in README.Debian accordingly. Thi

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

Le 11/11/2015 21:58, Jean-Christophe Dubacq a écrit : > I don't even want to speak about the /etc files that act as cache data > and config mixed together (I am looking at you, CUPS). You can also find database in text files with a checksum so you cannot modify them by hand (I am looking at the cn

Re: Config upgrade with cme (was Re: (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.)

Le 12/11/2015 18:36, Dominique Dumont a écrit : > Hello Vincent > > On Wednesday 11 November 2015 17:11:13 Vincent Danjean wrote: >> I looked at [2] (cme seems really powerfull to offer automatic >> upgrade/merge of config files). I've two questions after reading the wiki: >> >> 1) I vaguely rec

Re: new default build flag from dpkg: -Wdate-time

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > > From our builds, we can only see 4 packages which fail to build due to > > this: [...] > > expeyes > > https://bugs.debian.org/790103 > > The reason why expeyes FTBFS, is that the flag -Wd

Re: An abrupt End to Debian Live

Daniel, since this rukus blew up and your announcement I have been considering my involvement with Debian (I have even install Devuan to see if that would suit my purposes). I don't have anything to add to my previous comments apart from I hope you create a Debian Live repository or PPA and let us

Work-needing packages report for Nov 13, 2015

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 677 (new: 2) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 175 (new: 2) Total number of packages request

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > While I still think etckeeper makes sense (and works even better) with > only admin changes kept in /etc, I'd certainly love it if I could tell > exactly what's *unique* about a given system by looking at the tiny > handful of files in /etc.

Re: Putting default config files in /usr [was; (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:08:04PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: You can also find database in text files with a checksum so you cannot modify them by hand (I am looking at the cn=config slapd database here). In a future slapd revision I hope to move those to /var, as they are in practice inte

Bug#804946: ITP: webwork-pg -- Problem rendering engine for WeBWorK

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Doug Torrance * Package name: webwork-pg Version : 2.10 Upstream Author : Mathematica Association of America Upstream Author : Mathematical Association of America * URL : http://webwork.maa.org/ * License : GPL/Artistic

Bug#804951: ITP: lua-nginx-kafka -- Pure Lua Kafka producer for the nginx embedded Lua language

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)" * Package name: lua-nginx-kafka Version : 0.05 Upstream Author : Name * URL : https://github.com/doujiang24/lua-resty-kafka * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: lua Description : Pure

Re: Config upgrade with cme (was Re: (newbie) Disruptive LIRC package update.)

On Thursday 12 November 2015 23:14:16 you wrote: > Ok. I was thinking wrong. I was under the impression that cme used > the original LCDd.conf. The wiki page is not clear enough then. I'll modify it. > Yes. I'm always a bit relunctant to not check that the merge of my > modif and upstream modif w