Bug#803038: ITP: ccdproc -- Basic data reductions of astronomy CCD images

2015-10-26 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: wnpp Owner: Ole Streicher Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org * Package name: ccdproc Version : 0.3.3 Upstream Author : Steve Crawford * URL : http://ccdproc.readthedocs.o

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-26 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:16:59PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > "why" is because node (and other modern languages) make it easy to > create a package for any particular bit of reusable code. That Debian > fails to support that is Debian's problem, not upstream's. That's not a counter-argument to

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 05:33:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [Context: http://bugs.debian.org/685878] > > We're now more than three years behind upstream (3.0 released > > 2012-07-09). > > My github repo is still waiting to be integrated with Debian. > And my point is still that there's an R

Bug#803077: ITP: librdf-lazy-perl -- lazy typing access to RDF data

2015-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: librdf-lazy-perl Version : 0.09 Upstream Author : Jakob Voß * URL : https://github.com/nichtich/RDF-Lazy * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Pr

Bug#803080: ITP: libtest-cpan-meta-json-perl -- module to validate CPAN META.json files

2015-10-26 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libtest-cpan-meta-json-perl Version : 0.16 Upstream Author : Barbie * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Test-CPAN-Meta-JS

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. This is > http://bugs.debian.org/751121. Did you check if they apply to netatalk 3.1.7? On the first quick look the problem files are gone. -- Bernd Zeimetz

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 20:27:07) > > On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. This >> is http://bugs.debian.org/751121. > > Did you check if they apply to netatalk 3.1.7? > On the first quick look the problem files a

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/26/2015 08:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 20:27:07) >> >> On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. >>> This is http://bugs.debian.org/

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 21:20:17) > On 10/26/2015 08:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 20:27:07) >>> On 10/26/2015 01:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: Looks like we're talking about ~10 FIXMEs in debian/copyrights. This is http://bugs.debian.org/7511

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/26/2015 09:37 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Thanks for your kind interest in this issue. > > I apologize for misunderstanding in what way you wanted to help > here. No worries. So far I was not able to find any pointer to an upstream bug r

Re: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#685878: Another year has passed, still no netatalk3

2015-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2015-10-26 22:31:56) > On 10/26/2015 09:37 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Thanks for your kind interest in this issue. >> >> I apologize for misunderstanding in what way you wanted to help >> here. > > No worries. > So far I was not able to find any pointer to an upstream

Bug#803111: ITP: python-flask-rdf -- Flask decorator to output RDF using content negotiation

2015-10-26 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth" * Package name: python-flask-rdf Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Author : Walter Huf * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/flask_rdf/0.1.7 * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Python Description

Re: Bug#802595: ITP: node-defined -- return the first argument that is `!== undefined`

2015-10-26 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Oct 26 2015, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:16:59PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: >> "why" is because node (and other modern languages) make it easy to >> create a package for any particular bit of reusable code. That Debian >> fails to support that is Debian's problem, not