On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:31:03PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> [Please CC me; not subscribed to -devel.]
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > So far as I know, all current Quark processors have errata that make
> > them unstable, not to mention totally insecure, when running ordinary
> > i386 binaries.
>
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Since the 686-class, introduced with the Pentium Pro, is now almost 20
years old, we believe there are few Debian systems still running that
have 586-class or hybrid processors. The only such processors
apparently still available for sale are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-sievelib
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Antoine Nguyen
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sievelib
* License : Expat
Program
2015-09-28 23:34 Josh Triplett:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
We propose to drop support for i386 processors older than 686-class in
the current release cycle. This would include folding libc6-i686 into
libc6, changing the default target for gcc, and changing the 586 kernel
flavour to 686 (non-PAE).
Si
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 10:02 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Since the 686-class, introduced with the Pentium Pro, is now almost 20
> years old, we believe there are few Debian systems still running that
> have 586-class or hybrid processors. The on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Enigmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWCnjpAAoJEMvmu05dmtOlhhAP/jrONPeihYKvvXYr34m6e47B
aw3MoFNkhT3NOSMujd3mfqPIejrDwbuV3aC7puvS9DCLZDPpxqbXaUnEOj9fe/dW
MJvTn9A1vNitJNKt7cJ+OYkl+EP+dV2BIXy29+C1mId3SozbBWbFRjWBgTfVp
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:48:26AM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:31:03PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > [Please CC me; not subscribed to -devel.]
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > So far as I know, all current Quark processors have errata that make
> > > them unstable, not to
Hi!
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 12:37:22 +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:12 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 21:12:57 +0300, Andy Beverley wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Owner: Andy Beverley
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:28 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The attached untested patch should in principle do it.
Thanks Guillem, will test that soon.
Andy
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Contrary to what I thought, the Xeon Phi processors are actually 64-bit
. However I think they're a little too weird to support with the same
binaries - no CMOV, no MMX and no SSE.
I think we’ve both been mistaken by Intel documents describing Xeon P
+++ Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo [2015-09-29 12:27 +0100]:
> 2015-09-28 23:34 Josh Triplett:
> >Many distributions have already dropped that support, making it all the
> >more valuable that Debian hasn't. I can certainly understand dropping
> >i386 and i486, but i586 remains useful today precisel
On Apr 22, 2015, at 01:25 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Rather, this is the Debian project considering our own instance of a
>first-class Git hosting platform.
I guess this would mean being able to use the Debian GitLab instance for
package development, rather than say Alioth? For straight-up hosting o
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: owner -1 aditibhat...@gmail.com
On Lu, 21 sep 15, 19:18:00, aditi bhatt wrote:
> package: wnppSeverity: wishlistOwner: 'Aditi Bhatt'
> *Package Name : quiet_assets Version : 1.1.0
> Upstream Author : Dmitry KODer Karpunun / Evrone.c
2015-09-29 17:38 Wookey:
+++ Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo [2015-09-29 12:27 +0100]:
Maybe it would be a good idea to split the architectures, and have one
port for legacy-but-still-sold-or-useful i386 and move the current i386
to only support newer, common-use i686 hardware.
It seems to me t
On 2015-09-28 22:14:44, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We propose to drop support for i386 processors older than 686-class in
> the current release cycle. This would include folding libc6-i686 into
> libc6, changing the default target for gcc, and changing the 586 kernel
> flavour to 686 (non-PAE).
>
> S
On 29 September 2015 at 17:24, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> As of Knights Landing, it is based on Airmont Atom cores which indeed support
> x86_64.
>
Correct.
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
On Tuesday 29 September 2015 02:07 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 08:41 PM, Balasankar C wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> indeed, that status page got my very excited.
>> Maintainer of that status page here. :)
>>>
>>> however, i wonder whether that page is actually getting the stat
17 matches
Mail list logo
