So,
I've been giving this some more thought, and have tried to write a spec, but
then found that...
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 05:03:15PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> https://lists.debian.org/deity/2014/01/msg00055.html
...this (and the discussion following it) actually seems fairly close to
what my
On 21/07/15 18:17, Zeev Pekar wrote:
[...]
May I ask somebody to volunteer to finish the initial creation of the
package, so it can be uploaded?
It has been developed/tested on Debian since 2010 so the process should
be smooth.
Packaging efforts for other distros are underway and probably can b
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Facilitating external repositories"):
> - It may be GPG-signed by one or more keys. Apt should have a way of
> configuring GPG keys that may be allowed to sign sources.list files,
> preloaded with the set of keys in the Debian keyring. This will allow
> system adm
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:46:47 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser writes ("Re: Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git
> integration tools"):
>> [workflow description]
>
> Thanks. FYI, dgit trees are (for `3.0 (quilt)' format source packages)
> what is nowadays called a `patches-applied pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med team
* Package name: dcmtkpp
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Julien Lamy
* URL : https://github.com/lamyj/dcmtkpp
* License : CeCILL-B
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Wrappers around DCMTK to hav
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Jeanson
* Package name: lttnganalyses
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Julien Desfossez
* URL : https://github.com/lttng/lttng-analyses
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : LTTng 2.0 tr
Control: block 792335 by -1
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: binplist
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Google Inc
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/libyal/binplist
* License : Apache-2.0
Description : binary property list par
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Facilitating external repositories"):
> > - It may be GPG-signed by one or more keys. Apt should have a way of
> > configuring GPG keys that may be allowed to sign sources.list files,
> > preloaded with
Package: general
Severity: minor
Hello Fellow Maintainers,
please tell me that I am wrong or that I start fighting the windmills if
that's the case, but I have a general impression that something smells
in lots of debian/rules files nowadays and we need a concept to improve
that.
The problem: I
Quoting Eduard Bloch (2015-07-23 19:43:46)
> The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff [in debian/rules files].
> In boost, there are about 12 such calls. And they run
> dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands.
debian/rules is a make file. In the make language, variabl
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:43:46 +0200 Eduard Bloch wrote:
> please tell me that I am wrong or that I start fighting the windmills if
> that's the case, but I have a general impression that something smells
> in lots of debian/rules files nowadays and we need a concept to improve
> that.
>
> The prob
* Eduard Bloch , 2015-07-23, 19:43:
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are
about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or
dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands. When this was done a just
couple of times (i.e. before dh(7)), that's acceptable. But now, it
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-07-23 21:08:15)
> * Eduard Bloch , 2015-07-23, 19:43:
>>The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are
>>about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or
>>dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands. When this was done a just
>>couple of times (i.
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I need to easily share my windows ntfs drives to my family and there is no
program for it like system-config-samba gui utility
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffectiv
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-07-23 21:08:15)
> > * Eduard Bloch , 2015-07-23, 19:43:
> >>The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are
> >>about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or
> >>dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands. When this was
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:08:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Eduard Bloch , 2015-07-23, 19:43:
> >The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about
> >12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or
> >similar commands. When this was done a just co
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Facilitating external repositories"):
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The /name/ of the external repository should also be covered by the
> > signature.
>
> What would you describe as the "name" of the repository?
>
> The URL is alre
Control: block -1 by 793330
Hi!
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:43:46 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: minor
> The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about
> 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or
> similar commands.
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 793330
Bug #793404 [general] massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline
commands
793404 was not blocked by any bugs.
793404 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 793404: 793330
--
793404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender
* Package name: python-wordpress-xmlrpc
Version : 2.3
Upstream Author : Max Cutler
* URL : https://github.com/maxcutler/python-wordpress-xmlrpc
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 678 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 179 (new: 5)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Unit 193
* Package name: virtualbox-ext-pack
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Author : Oracle Corporation
* URL : https://www.virtualbox.org/
* License : VirtualBox PUEL
Description : support for USB 2.0 devices, VirtualBox
Processing control commands:
> block 793404 by -1
Bug #793404 [general] massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline
commands
793404 was blocked by: 793330
793404 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 793404: 793440
--
793404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Processing control commands:
> block 793404 by -1
Bug #793404 [general] massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline
commands
793404 was blocked by: 793330 793440
793404 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 793404: 793443
--
793404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Limonciello
* Package name: fwupd
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Richard Hughes
* URL : https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Firmware update daemon
fwupd i
Hi,
I'd like to package (and maintain) a small and old game called Down!,
written in Ruby/SDL [1]. I sent an ITP using reportbug -B debian wnpp
(since I'm using Mint 17.2), filled it out. I was to receive a
confirmation but got no such message.
What could go wrong?
Thanks
Marcin
26 matches
Mail list logo
