Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Hackett
* Package name: gogs
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : lu...@gitea.io
* URL : https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Golang
Description : Gogs is a self hosted service aim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Balasankar C
* Package name: ruby-faker
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : Benjamin Curtis
* URL : https://github.com/stympy/faker
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : easily generate fake data
❦ 10 juillet 2015 22:00 GMT, Jeremy Stanley :
> Simulating Gerrit's behaviors in this regard would probably not
> satisfy the desire for a "replacement for pull requests" however
> since Gerrit assumes a LKML-esque "rebase your patch until you get
> it right" approach rather than the "keep stack
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> > It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by
>> > Debian. Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting.
>>
>> Much appreciated, thank you to GitLab B.V. for this generous offer.
Just out of curiosity, has anybody ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. See
balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. Gitlab folks sponsored 60 days of
work with 3000 usd. I post updates at poddery.com/tags/debian-gitlab-months
On 2015, ജൂലൈ 11 6:51
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging.
> See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status.
That is quite a progress. Awesome, thanks!
Cheers.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jul 2015 18:34:47 +0200
with message-id <55a145a7.6060...@sourcepole.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#791536: general: Debian 7.8 running EXTREMELY slow.
Like chronic stop script error.
has caused the Debian Bug report #791536,
regarding general: Debian 7.8 running EXTREMELY
Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with
Git ‘request-pull ’"):
> My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication>
> leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull request”
> without having a GitHub account.
>
> Decentralisation
We've had some discussion of some of these issues already, but let me
summarise:
Most current workflows for Debian packaging with git involve a git
repository somewhere, and in practice it is very impractical not to
trust the contents of (at least some branches in) that repository.
Currently AFAI
Ian Jackson writes:
> Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible
> with Git ‘request-pull ’"):
> > My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication>
> > leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull
> > request” without having a GitHub
Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with
Git ‘request-pull ’"):
> A putative decentralised [0] Git pull request feature would IMO require
> that anyone with a Git repository can submit a pull request to any
> other, without any registration on a privileged c
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 06:12:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible
> with Git ‘request-pull ’"):
> > My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication>
> > leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pu
On 2015-07-11 22:32:31 -0300 (-0300), Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I have a few ideas about this. I have used gerrit before, and it
> provides a really nice experience except for 2 little facts:
>
> - you have to use a web UI thingy to review patches (although that said
> web UI does have a really
13 matches
Mail list logo
