[no subject]

2015-01-01 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi, I am maintaining both ntop and ntopng. They are both in testing. ntop is no longer supported by upstream and I would like to remove it from Debian. ntopng is a complete rewrite of ntop. How would you recommend to phase it out? I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but: -

Re: motd handling in jessie & beyond

2015-01-01 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 12:04 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think UsePAM yes is the only sane default for Debian, though, and people > who choose to change that default are legitimately on their own. I've used UsePAM no for many years without any real issues, as you said it depends what you want (a

Re: motd handling in jessie & beyond

2015-01-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes: > On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 12:04 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think UsePAM yes is the only sane default for Debian, though, and >> people who choose to change that default are legitimately on their own. > I've used UsePAM no for many years without any real issue

Re: (unknown)

2015-01-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
Ludovico Cavedon wrote: [...] > I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but: > - ntop has version 3:5.0.1, ntopng 1.2.1. I would need to bump the ntopng > version to 4, and I am not very excited by that [...] Hello, you would not need to change the version (epoch) of the ntopng

Re: none

2015-01-01 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ludovico Cavedon > I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but: > - ntop has version 3:5.0.1, ntopng 1.2.1. I would need to bump the ntopng > version to 4, and I am not very excited by that > - there is no migration path from ntop to ntopng. All settings and data would > be

Re: motd handling in jessie & beyond

2015-01-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/31/2014 03:20 PM, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > The changes are in total 2+1+3 lines, plus killing two files, so > relatively simple. On the flip side, this touches five > essential/required packages so it might be a bit too much for jessie's > freeze, although I also wonder if the current state

Work-needing packages report for Jan 2, 2015

2015-01-01 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 671 (new: 14) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 146 (new: 0) Total number of packages reques

Re:

2015-01-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Should I just request the removal of ntop instead? That seems to be the best option. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro