On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:53:01 +0200, Andreas Tille
wrote:
> Description : efficient mapping of short reads with periodic spaced seeds
> PerM is a software package which was designed to perform highly efficient
> genome scale alignments for hundreds of millions of short reads produced by
> the
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo writes:
> 2014-04-26 07:51 Ben Finney:
> > If it's in the Debian source package, it is distributed as part of
> > Debian.
(I'm assuming, from the lack of response to this point, that this is
uncontroversial.)
> What's your position on 'configure' scripts for which
The two documents are incompatible, and the DFSG is very laxist and do
not protects completely freedom. FSDG protects freedoms : it resolves
issues : proprietary software is totally banned, patents are prohibited,
trademarks limited, etc.
GFDL is free, because Invariant Sections are free if used i
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:05:21 +0200
Solal wrote:
> The two documents are incompatible, and the DFSG is very laxist and do
> not protects completely freedom. FSDG protects freedoms : it resolves
> issues : proprietary software is totally banned, patents are prohibited,
> trademarks limited, etc.
>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> > >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
> > >>
> > >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
> >
> > > Could You elaborate on that ? Why would open
>> The two documents are incompatible, and the DFSG is very laxist and do
>> not protects completely freedom. FSDG protects freedoms : it resolves
>> issues : proprietary software is totally banned, patents are prohibited,
>> trademarks limited, etc.
>>
>> GFDL is free, because Invariant Sections a
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:16:31 +0200
Solal wrote:
> > I see that you don't like the DFSG. But as already has been said: We
> > are Debian and follow our own contract and not a contact of some other
> > project/company.
> > I think if you have problems with the DFSG you should propose changes
> > to
Ben Finney writes:
>> 2014-04-26 07:51 Ben Finney:
>>> If it's in the Debian source package, it is distributed as part of
>>> Debian.
> (I'm assuming, from the lack of response to this point, that this is
> uncontroversial.)
You should probably not assume that. Rather, you should probably assu
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the csv2latex package.
Due to insufficient rights for uploading csv2latex to
ftp-master i would like a kind mentor to review and
eventually upload csv2latex-0.18-3 (just a deb-related
fix, not upstream). I now maintain both upst
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ben Finney writes:
> >> 2014-04-26 07:51 Ben Finney:
>
> >>> If it's in the Debian source package, it is distributed as part of
> >>> Debian.
>
> You should probably not assume [that statement to be uncontroversial
> within the Debian project].
Thanks. I note, though, tha
Ben Finney writes:
> Okay. Is it accurate to say, then, that you and I agree these files are
> distributed as part of the Debian source package, and thereby part of
> Debian?
Mu. I find this definition of the problem reductionist and overly
simplistic and think there are various shades of grey
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 26 avril 2014 16:34 CEST, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> :
>
> >>Good to know. I was using a dedicated "dfsg" branch, but the workflow is
> >>crappy in this case. But currently, nothing we can do with
> >>debian/copyright?
> >
Hi,
I was using pages such as:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to track the upstream version of my Debian packages. The upstrean
version comes from uscan i.e. tarball.
Recent a friendly "FTBFS on amd64" bug report gave me a wake up call.
https:/
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I realized that I overlooked the upstream ML message.
> | ibus 1.5.6 is released:
> | https://github.com/ibus/ibus/releases/tag/1.5.6
> | ...
>
> Yes, this release is done by the git tag.
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#GitHub
> There is
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50:48PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I realized that I overlooked the upstream ML message.
> | ibus 1.5.6 is released:
> | https://github.com/ibus/ibus/releases/tag/1.5.6
> | ...
>
> Yes, this release is done by the git tag. There is no public pointer
> to the tarball. T
Hi all,
I'm a bit disapointed. I don't know what to do. I try to fix following bug
: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744317
Two files are pointed to have no upstream source. Theses files are html
template files used by a javascript engine. If I understood, the problem is
that the
>
> Jo Nicolas,
>
> You could generate the minified javascript from normal javascript files.
>
>
I know that but non minified files don't work. It gives errors "Uncaught
SyntaxError: Unexpected token ILLEGAL"
On 27/04/14, 06:18pm, Nicolas wrote:
> >
> > Jo Nicolas,
> >
> > You could generate the minified javascript from normal javascript files.
> >
> >
> I know that but non minified files don't work. It gives errors "Uncaught
> SyntaxError: Unexpected token ILLEGAL"
Then the issue is with the source fi
On 2014-04-24 22:04:40 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Following the discussion from a few days ago about Cava (C like language
> with no undefined behavior), gcc 4.9 is now out[1]. One of the changes
> there is a runtime check for undefined behavior. Just compile with
> -fsanitize=undefined, and y
On Sunday 27 April 2014 09:37 PM, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a bit disapointed. I don't know what to do. I try to fix following
> bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744317
> Two files are pointed to have no upstream source. Theses files are
> html template files used by a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: golang-objx-dev
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tyler Bunnell
* URL : http://github.com/stretchr/objx
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go package for dealing with
Hello Benoit,
On 27/04/14 15:49, Benoît Rouits wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request assistance with maintaining the csv2latex package.
>
> Due to insufficient rights for uploading csv2latex to
> ftp-master i would like a kind mentor to review and
> eventually upload csv2late
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams
* Package name: django-longerusername
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Steven Skoczen
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/longerusername
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : allo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: golang-raft
Version : 0.0~20140427
Upstream Author : go-raft contributors (Ben Johnson et al.)
* URL : http://github.com/coreos/raft
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
* Package name: guzzle-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Michael Dowling
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/guzzle_sphinx_theme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: golang-gogoprotobuf
Version : 0.0~20140427
Upstream Author : Walter Schulze , Vastech SA (PTY) LTD
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/gogoprotobuf
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
De
On 27 April 2014 11:05, Solal wrote:
> The two documents are incompatible, and the DFSG is very laxist and do
> not protects completely freedom. FSDG protects freedoms : it resolves
> issues : proprietary software is totally banned, patents are prohibited,
> trademarks limited, etc.
>
Which freed
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> And simultaneous installation of multiple versions of packages is
> simply a requirement for many research computing scenarios, usually
> because there's a lot of bespoke scientific code that accomplishes
> some specific goal but was not written to the sta
On 27 April 2014 13:16, Solal wrote:
>>> The two documents are incompatible, and the DFSG is very laxist and do
>>> not protects completely freedom. FSDG protects freedoms : it resolves
>>> issues : proprietary software is totally banned, patents are prohibited,
>>> trademarks limited, etc.
>>>
>>
2014-04-28 2:16 GMT+02:00 Don Armstrong :
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> And simultaneous installation of multiple versions of packages is
>> simply a requirement for many research computing scenarios, usually
>> because there's a lot of bespoke scientific code that accomplishes
>> s
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> And simultaneous installation of multiple versions of packages is
>> simply a requirement for many research computing scenarios, usually
>> because there's a lot of bespoke scientific code that accomplishes some
>> specific goal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Dybian
* Package name: r-cran-ape
Version : 3.1-1
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ape/index.html
* License : (GPL-2+)
Description : GNU R package for Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution
I am pa
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:50:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Containers would be a better environment, but you have to make them very,
> very simple to set up.
You mean like something imaginary command like
create_my_vm --
creating a virtual machine and installs with the specified
version
34 matches
Mail list logo
