Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer
* Package name: vcmi
Version : 0.95
Upstream Author : Micha³ Urbañczyk aka Tow
Ivan Savenko
Tom Zielinski aka Warmonger
AVS
Benjamin Gentner
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: libcofoja-java
Version: 1.1-r150
Upstream Author: 2010-2011 Google, Inc.
2010-2011, 2013 Nhat Minh Lê
2007 Johannes Rie
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> FWIW, I think the concept of a graphic needing its source is also bogus.
> It means that the upstream have to hang onto some script they might of
> used once years ago for.. what reason?
> To give you a concrete example, I made the SPI logo (an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: tuskar-ui
Version : 0.0.9
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/tuskar-ui/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:07:22AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> > FWIW, I think the concept of a graphic needing its source is also bogus.
> > It means that the upstream have to hang onto some script they might of
> > used once years ago for.. wha
On 03/13/2014 11:45 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 mars 2014 22:26 CET, Ben Finney :
>
>>> The javascript world is difficult to deal with. They like embedded
>>> copies, they may not really care about API/ABI stability, even for big
>>> projects. Those are difficulties that we already have to
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> A PNG is not a program.
Depends on your definition of program. PNG files are programs that run
in a PNG decoder. ELF binaries aren't programs, they are just data
interpreted by CPUs.
> There is no source required for a PNG under DFSG #2
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:50:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > A PNG is not a program.
> Depends on your definition of program.
Yes. If you use the English definition of the word "program", then it's not
a program. But I guess if you ma
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:50:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> I guess you are referring to the GR that clarified the Social Contract
>> to read "work" instead of "software".
>> https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003
> That was a conscious decision on the part of the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That was a conscious decision on the part of the project to revise the text
> of the Social Contract. That vote did *not* replace the use of the word
> "program" in DFSG#2 with the word "software". It is incorrect to infer from
> this vot
Paul Wise writes:
> As far as I can tell, not modifying the DSFG at the same time was an
> oversight. Fixing that mistake was attempted in a later GR but that was
> blocked with a narrow margin.
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004
That GR proposal does not require source for non-program
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
>> As far as I can tell, not modifying the DSFG at the same time was an
>> oversight. Fixing that mistake was attempted in a later GR but that was
>> blocked with a narrow margin.
>
>> https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:24:19AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > That was a conscious decision on the part of the project to revise the text
> > of the Social Contract. That vote did *not* replace the use of the word
> > "program" in DFSG#2
Le Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> I note that the ftpmasters currently reject packages that are missing
> source for non-programmatic works (REJECT-FAQ explicitly mentions
> PS/PDF documentation). So the current archive requirements are in
> practice stricter than t
On 03/13/2014 04:57 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Philipp Kern , 2014-03-12, 21:11:
>> I still think it should be acceptable given that it's an open source
>> project, it's clearly versioned from which source it comes and we
>> check by not using the file that no changes have been done to the
>> minifi
15 matches
Mail list logo
