Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-seamicroclient
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Rohan Kanade
* URL : https://github.com/seamicro/python-seamicroclient
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descriptio
Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2014 11:52:05 +0200
with message-id <20140209095205.GC3138@sid.nuvreauspam>
and subject line Re: Bug#738323: general: Wacom Baboo Pad dont work
has caused the Debian Bug report #738323,
regarding general: Wacom Baboo Pad dont work
to be marked as done.
This means that
Another round of nitpicking:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:41:56AM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > On 02/07/2014 10:25 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > >Is there a policy on how to package software that does not make releases?
> >
>
Hi
I just activated the following changes to our autoreject lintian tags.
The full file, as always, is available from [1], diff with changes
below.
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags
From those tags, the following do hit more than just one or two packages:
gzip-file-is-not-m
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Unfortunately, due to a lack of time, motivation/interest I am
requesting an adopter for socat.
I am willing to sponsor the first few uploads if a non-DD would like to
take over.
Long description is:
Socat (for SOcket
* Joerg Jaspert , 2014-02-09, 12:04:
I just activated the following changes to our autoreject lintian tags.
The full file, as always, is available from [1], diff with changes
below.
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags
From those tags, the following do hit more than just one
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Due to an unfortunate lack of time and interest, I am requesting a
adopter for rotix.
I am willing to sponsor the first few uploads if a non-DD would like to
adopt it.
Here is the long description for rotix:
Rotix allo
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Back in 2004 before I was a debian developer, I was looking to package a
> script I wrote called patmv. patmv was inspired by rename perl but has
> slightly different behavior. You can find the thread about it here:
>
> https://li
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev
> >
Hello,
On Feb 9, 2014 12:12 PM, "Chris Taylor" wrote:
> Unfortunately, due to a lack of time, motivation/interest I am
> requesting an adopter for socat.
That's sad. Socat is a great piece of software which saved me hours many
times, and it certainly needs to be maintained. Unfortunately, I'm af
]] Tzafrir Cohen
> Answering myself: here's a simpler trick:
>
> Subversion revisions:
>
> 0~svn
>
> Switching to git:
>
> 0.0~git
Why do you want to put the git/svn before the revision information?
0~20140209+svn1234
0~20140209+git$sha1
If you need m
Quoting Thomas Weber (2014-02-09 13:00:47)
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
>>> wrote:
Hi,
lcms needs to go for jessie in fa
Le 9 févr. 2014 12:03, "Joerg Jaspert" a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> I just activated the following changes to our autoreject lintian tags.
> The full file, as always, is available from [1], diff with changes
> below.
>
> [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags
>
> From those tags, the follow
Hi,
While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
packages, so I'd like to talk about that.
One thing that bothers me is that some of our sysv-rc init.d scripts
aren't using /bin/sh as interpreter.
For
[Thomas Goirand]
> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note
> that this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid
> ugly hacks.
You can find all init.d scripts unpacked on lintian.debian
Hi.
Paul Wise writes:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> Which CGI are we talking about? Perhaps we can give more specific advice.
>
> I guess you mean Online Python Tutor (#737732).
>
Damn BTS ;) Indeed, I was considering OPT.
> Looking at the git repo, it includes a lot
[Sergey B Kirpichev]
> They aren't too complex, actually.
Good. Perhaps someone got time to test if their content can be easily
transformed into init-d-script users. :)
> Probably, we should have hooks, that can be invoked before specified
> action (e.g. start or stop) and after. But not just f
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Thomas Goirand]
>> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
>> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note
>> that this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid
>> ugly
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
> use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
> packages, so I'd like to talk about that.
>
> One thing that bothers me i
On 02/09/2014 11:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
>> use, I think it's more productive to try to improve what we have in
>> packages, so I'd like to
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:14:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
>...
> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note that
> this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid ugl
I apologize this RFA was sent in error.
Ignore it, it has already been adopted some 6-months ago.
Shouldn't send out RFAs at 3AM.
-Chris
On Feb 9, 2014 3:54 AM, "Andrew Shadura" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Feb 9, 2014 12:12 PM, "Chris Taylor" wrote:
> > Unfortunately, due to a lack of time, motiv
* Jakub Wilk , 2014-02-09, 12:21:
gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe (8 packages, 17 tags, plus 3 overrides)
It is non-fatal, so can be overriden if needed.
Link for the lazy:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe.html
The fact that Lintian complains about ab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "gustavo panizzo "
* Package name: python-jsmin
Version : 2.0.9
Upstream Author : Tikitu de Jager
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/dcs/jsmin
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : JavaScript minifie
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 09:19:55 -0800:
> On 02/09/2014 11:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-02-09 05:14:17 -0800:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While we can discuss during literally *years* about which init system to
> >> use, I think it
On 13482 March 1977, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I would like to add license-problem-md5sum-non-free and ont distibutable.
Lets see, the following license-problem-* sound interesting beside the
json-evil we already have:
license-problem-font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment (14 packages, 3032 tags, plu
On Feb 09, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > That's it... So that's a typical case where it should be possible to fix
> > things, and get rid of bash.
> Is that really an important goal to spend our time on?
No. It has never been a goal, there is nothing to "fix" here.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descr
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>...
> license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
>
> Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
Actually seems to be a real hit, when you scroll to the bottom of
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/contr
Package: wnpp
Owner: Radu-Bogdan Croitoru
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhtml-element-library-perl
Version : 5.120100
Upstream Author : Terrence Brannon
* URL : https://metacpan.org/releas
I'd like these tags to be added to the fatal list:
* debian-changelog-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding
I believe that dak already rejects packages with non-UTF-8 changelogs
by other means (see bug #717851), so adding it to the list would be
a purely informative change.
* debian-copyright
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:13:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >...
> > license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
> >
> > Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
>
> Actually seems to be a real hit, when you scroll
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
> AFAICS for now, it uses a whitelist of python modules that are allowed
> (see [0]).
Those look mostly safe. Only things I could think of would be entropy
exhaustion via random or DoS via a big bunch of math or a big regex. I
would suggest a
On 06.02.2014 01:58, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> Which CGI are we talking about? Perhaps we can give more specific advice.
>
> I guess you mean Online Python Tutor (#737732).
>
> Looking at the git repo, it includes a lot of embedded code copies of
>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:31:09 +0100
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> A few months ago I drafted an idea to rewrite init.d scripts to use a
> common implementation and only specify the unique parts in the init.d
> scripts themselves. That draft can be found on
> http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-trollius
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Guido van Rossum
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/enovance/trollius/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : por
35 matches
Mail list logo
