-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Norbert,
Le 03/09/2013 02:10, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Are you planning to block TeX Live transition for unforeseeable future?
Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see
Hi David,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
> the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
> feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
> convenient dummy transitional packa
(Long answer, but I promise to limit my messages in this thread).
Le Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:08:12PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> Yes. For the record, this day when Charles sent this mail, I was working
> in NEW from early in the morning to about 9:00 at night. I don't want
> thanks or e
Le 02/09/2013 06:12, Paul R. Tagliamonte a écrit :
> Respectfully - when we add micro (under Size 100 packages) the amount of
> metadata added to every mirror and every users machine is almost as much as
> the package contents.
>
> This is a very common request (make sure this really needs to be
Dear Norbert,
I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Not sure if you get why, oh, my.
I'll give you a little hint:
always assume the worst,
spread the word,
and for maximum impact,
put names in subject too.
This really really helps and is super joyful.
cheers,
Holger
signature.a
Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-misaka
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Frank Smit
* URL : http://misaka.61924.nl/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : binding for Sundown, a markdown pars
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
> to be included in packages such as util-linux and few (no?) system/devel
> packages already have
2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
> Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
> packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
> and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
Although this could be possible, a second upload would be needed
anyway (hopefully in a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-steadymark
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcao
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/steadymark
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : markdow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-sure
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcao
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/sure
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : utility belt for
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> How you can help (NEW-TEST-HELP)
>
>
> Add tests to your packages. The full specification for these tests
> are available from [AUTOPKG]. If you need inspiration, consider looking
> at some of the e
Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
>> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
>> to be included in packages such as util-linux an
Paul Wise wrote:
>Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
>packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
>and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
Why should we rush to let more broken stuff into the archive?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >
> >> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
> >> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-couleur
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcão
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/couleur
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : tool t
Hey Charles,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:43:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> first of all, please let me clarify that the reason why I answered on our core
> mailing list is not to fingerpoint if or not you are wrong, but becase this is
> the only way I have to see if others agree
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
> > Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
> > packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
> > and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
>
> Although this could be possible,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Thanks for the helpful comment instead of fixing things.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.in
Package: wnpp
Owner: Bas Couwenberg
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libpg-hstore-perl
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Galimov Albert
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pg-hstore/
* License
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> 2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
>> > Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
>> > packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
>> > and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
>>
>
Hi Everyone,
Though it is actually not a Debian specific question (since on pure
Debian builts/links fine), I hope to find help and wisdom here.
We (neurodebian) have a package for AFNI which we have been cooking for a
while... with a recent change to force -Wl,--no-undefined I got into a weird
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: camo
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Rick Olson and Cory Donohoe
* URL : https://github.com/atmos/camo
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript (nodejs)
Description : SSL image
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:42:32AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> ~/afni-0.20130830~dfsg.1/build-x86_64-linux-gnu/avovk# gcc --param
> ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat-security -g -O2
> -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > ~/afni-0.20130830~dfsg.1/build-x86_64-linux-gnu/avovk# gcc --param
> > ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat-security -g -O2
> > -fstack-protector
> > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused
> > -fopenm
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_ztrsv'
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_scasum'
> > If y
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> Camo is all about making insecure assets look secure. This is an SSL
> image proxy to prevent mixed content warnings on secure pages.
Is distributing software that pretends it is secure a good idea?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulW
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 13:02 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
> This provides integrity protection and last-mile confidentiality to
> images, thus preventing a local network attacker from seeing the images
> you request (allowing for possible disclosure of the content you're
> viewing) or changing their
Le 03/09/2013 14:50, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> So, I'm looking for a package that would accept this ruby script
>> (I will probably ask linux-util anyway if nobody has other suggestions)
>> and I will keep it in my perso repos
It would probably more helpful to approach our release team asking for
advice how to proceed with transition than sending this blunt rant into d-d.
O.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d
>
> [short explanation for d-d: debian
Le 03/09/2013 18:26, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> btw - even on Debian systems it is not:
>> $> ldd /usr/lib/libgsl.so
>> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff5fddb000)
>> libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi again,
Le 03/09/2013 03:37, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
>> if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
>> feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
>> convenient dummy tra
Vincent Danjean writes:
> The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
> package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
> Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does not involve
> to rewrite the script).
moreutils is another po
Hi David,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> I was directly proposing that, instead of silently removing the
> texlive-lang-danish — and at least texlive-lang-norwegian — binary
> packages, they could be added back as dummy transitional packages
I understood your proposal, of course. Still
[Norbert Preining]
> I understood your proposal, of course. Still, since there are no rdepends
> besides very few (1?) build-depends on these two packages, I consider
> it a a waste of resources.
Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
package dependency - in other w
On Aug 31, 2013, at 01:37 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>In the end, this meant that using UDD had some minor benefits (a richer
>history, and theoretical improved merge support)
I'd argue that they were more than minor benefits!
>but there were a number of extra things you had to watch out for tha
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
> package dependency - in other words, users would never install it
> explicitly because they want its functionality. Is that correct? This
I never said that. The functionality is no
> > Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
> > package dependency - in other words, users would never install it
> > explicitly because they want its functionality. Is that correct? This
[Norbert Preining]
> I never said that. The functionality is now in
> te
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages.
TL2013 made big changes to the naming of packages. If I go down
th
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 10:57 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> > Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
>
> conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages
On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> How much do those packages weigh, Norbert? Are TeX transitional
> packages particularly heavy?
In kg? In bit? In work time?
> I really don't know why you think TeX is exempt from the usual
> requirements to support clean upgrades between Debian releases
On 09/03/2013 02:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Danjean writes:
>
>> The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
>> package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
>> Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does not involve
tony mancill writes:
> Thank you for pointing this out. I just recently uploaded a script,
> splitpatch, that I argued should be accepted as-is (i.e. as a "micro
> package") because of the dependency on ruby.
> Given that ruby is becoming more popular for scripting, what do folks
> think about
43 matches
Mail list logo
